Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446909›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2016

Fabrication and Pilot In Vivo Study of a Collagen-BDDGE-Elastin Core-Shell Scaffold for Tendon Regeneration.

Monica Sandri, Giuseppe Filardo, Elizaveta Kon, Silvia Panseri, Monica Montesi, Michele Iafisco, Elisa Savini, Simone Sprio, Carla Cunha, Gianluca Giavaresi and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Grafts in tendon repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tendon Tissue Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Recent advances in tendon tissue engineering strategy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Combined ascorbic acid and TJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica SandriInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council , Faenza , Italy.
Giuseppe FilardoBiomechanics and Technology Innovation Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, II Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, Bologna, Italy; Nano-Biotechnology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, II Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, Bologna, Italy.
Elizaveta KonBiomechanics and Technology Innovation Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, II Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, Bologna, Italy; Nano-Biotechnology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, II Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia PanseriInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council , Faenza , Italy.
Monica MontesiInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council , Faenza , Italy.
Michele IafiscoInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council , Faenza , Italy.
Elisa SaviniInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council , Faenza , Italy.
Simone SprioInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council , Faenza , Italy.
Carla Cunhai3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto , Porto , Portugal.
Gianluca GiavaresiLaboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy; Laboratory of Biocompatibility, Technological Innovations and Advanced Therapies, Department RIT Rizzoli-Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca VeronesiLaboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute , Bologna , Italy.
Milena FiniLaboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy; Laboratory of Biocompatibility, Technological Innovations and Advanced Therapies, Department RIT Rizzoli-Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Luca SalvatoreDepartment of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento , Lecce , Italy.
Alessandro SanninoDepartment of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento , Lecce , Italy.
Maurilio Marcaccii3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto , Porto , Portugal.
Anna TampieriInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council , Faenza , Italy.
National Research Council · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Salento · ITInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of bio-devices for complete regeneration of ligament and tendon tissues is presently one of the biggest challenges in tissue engineering. Such device must simultaneously possess optimal mechanical performance, suitable porous structure, and biocompatible microenvironment. This study proposes a novel collagen-BDDGE-elastin (CBE)-based device for tendon tissue engineering, by the combination of two different modules: (i) a load-bearing, non-porous, "core scaffold" developed by braiding CBE membranes fabricated via an evaporative process and (ii) a hollow, highly porous, "shell scaffold" obtained by uniaxial freezing followed by freeze-drying of CBE suspension, designed to function as a physical guide and reservoir of cells to promote the regenerative process. Both core and shell materials demonstrated good cytocompatibility in vitro, and notably, the porous shell architecture directed cell alignment and population within the sample. Finally, a prototype of the core module was implanted in a rat tendon lesion model, and histological analysis demonstrated its safety, biocompatibility, and ability to induce tendon regeneration. Overall, our results indicate that such device may have the potential to support and induce in situ tendon regeneration.

Indexed as

biomimetic scaffoldcollagenelastinligamenttendontissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID27446909
PMCPMC4923187
OpenAlexW2469211876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.