Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446892›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2016

How Do Primary Care Physicians Perceive the Role of Nurses in Quality Measurement and Improvement? The Israeli Story.

Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot, Dorit Goldman, Bruce Rosen, Calanit Kay, Rachel Wilf-Miron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions on Nurses' Shared Responsibility for Quality of Patient Care: A Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel Nissanholtz-GannotDepartment of Health Management, Ariel University, University Hill, Ariel, Israel; Smokler Centre for Health Policy Research, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dorit GoldmanMeuhedet Health Services , Tel-Aviv , Israel.
Bruce RosenSmokler Centre for Health Policy Research, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute , Jerusalem , Israel.
Calanit KayCommunity Health Services, Clalit Health Services , Tel Aviv , Israel.
Rachel Wilf-MironThe Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel Aviv, Israel; The School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsrael has boasted a highly effective national quality monitoring program for community-based health services since 2004. The program involves ongoing monitoring of the quality of selected services provided by Israeli health plans and includes approximately 70 indicators.

objectiveTo analyze Israeli primary care physicians' (PCPs) perceptions of nurses' roles in the national quality monitoring program and their contribution to improving health-care quality.

designA cross sectional survey using self-reported questionnaire.

settingFour Israeli health plans, covering 100% of the Israeli population.

participantsA representative sample of 1,000 Israeli PCPs. Response rate of 69% (605 out of the 884 physicians who met the study criteria).

methodsA questionnaire combined with closed questions on the attitudes and behaviors of the physicians regarding nurses' involvement in quality monitoring and open questions about the changes that had made in their practice as a result of the quality monitoring program.

resultsMost respondents (74%) agreed that nurses contribute to practice quality and share responsibility for improving quality measures. Physicians who felt that quality monitoring improved the quality of care and those who supported the program were more likely to consider that nurses shared responsibility for the quality of care. However, in open-ended questions about the changes they made in their practices as a result of the program, they made minimal reference to the importance of nurses and their contribution to improved quality indicators.

conclusionThere was a disparity between the closed-ended and open-ended questions regarding the way physicians depicted the role of nurses in quality monitoring and improvement. This disparity may be due to the fact that physicians do not yet fully appreciate the growing involvement of nurses in these areas.

Indexed as

attitudesnursesquality improvementquality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID27446892
PMCPMC4916176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.