Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446837›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2016

Unexpected Findings in Magnetic Resonance Enterography and Their Clinical Significance.

Srivathsan Ravindran, Sarah Helen Hancox, Neil Barlow, Arthur Dunk, David Howlett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Srivathsan RavindranDigestive Disease Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK.
Sarah Helen HancoxEastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, UK.
Neil BarlowRadiology Department, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, UK.
Arthur DunkGastroenterology Department, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, UK.
David HowlettRadiology Department, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne BN21 2UD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims. To identify the prevalence of colonic and extraenteric incidental findings in magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and their clinical significance. Methods. We retrospectively analysed 470 MRE studies carried out between March 2012 and 2014. Incidental findings were defined as those not expected from or made apparent on the referral. MRE reports were reviewed for colonic and extraenteric findings, subcategorised into "clinically significant" and "insignificant." Follow-up was identified from the electronic patient record. Results. The majority of MRE requests were made for inflammatory bowel disease (97%). In total, 114 incidental findings were noted in 94 (20%) scans performed. There were 29 "colonic" findings (25%) with 55% having a diagnosis of colitis. Out of 85 extraenteric findings, ovarian cysts (25%), renal cysts (10%), and abdominal lymphadenopathy (9%) were the commonest. Cumulatively, 59 cases were clinically significant (52%); of these, 30 findings were not previously diagnosed, amounting to 26% of all incidental findings. This led to intervention in seven patients. Conclusions. Incidental findings are common in MRE and there is a substantial proportion that is clinically significant and requires further investigation. There need to be stratification of risk and employment of local guidelines in order to achieve this.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildColonColonic DiseasesFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesKidney Diseases, CysticLymphadenopathyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID27446837
PMCPMC4904694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.