Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446828›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2016

Age Is the Only Predictor of Poor Bowel Preparation in the Hospitalized Patient.

Julia McNabb-Baltar, Alastair Dorreen, Hisham Al Dhahab, Michael Fein, Xin Xiong, Mike O' Byrne, Imene Ait, Myriam Martel, Alan N Barkun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Split dose bowel preparation before colonoscopy of PEG (Nulytely) in comparison to routine single dose bowel preparation.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Factors influencing inpatient bowel preparation: a scoping review.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bowel preparation quality between hospitalized patients and outpatient colonoscopies.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia McNabb-BaltarDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alastair DorreenDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hisham Al DhahabRoyal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
Michael FeinDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Xin XiongDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mike O' ByrneDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Imene AitDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Myriam MartelDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alan N BarkunDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
McGill University · CABrigham and Women's Hospital · USRoyal Hospital · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the impact of key variables on the likelihood of inpatient poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Records of inpatients that underwent colonoscopy at our institution between January 2010 and December 2011 were retrospectively extracted. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to assess the effect of clinical variables on the odds of poor preparation. Tested predictors included age; gender; use of narcotics; heavy medication burden; comorbidities; history of previous abdominal surgery; neurological disorder; product used for bowel preparation, whether or not the bowel regimen was given as split or standard dose; and time of endoscopy. Overall, 244 patients were assessed including 83 (34.0%, 95% CI: 28.1-39.9%) with poor bowel preparation. Cecal intubation was achieved in 81.1% of patients (95% CI: 76.2-86.0%). When stratified by quality of bowel preparation, cecal intubation was achieved in only 65.9% (95% CI: 60.0-71.9%) of patients with poor bowel preparation and 89.9% (95% CI: 86.1-93.7%) of patient with good bowel preparation. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only advancing age was an independent predictor of poor bowel preparation (OR = 1.026, CI: 1.006 to 1.045, and p = 0.008). Age is the only independent predictor of poor bowel preparation amongst hospitalized patients.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCatharticsCecumColonoscopyFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCathartics

Identifiers

PMID27446828
PMCPMC4904653
OpenAlexW2340323771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.