Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446566›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2016

Recurrence patterns in patients with high-grade glioma following temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy.

Xiaofeng Zhou, Xiaofang Liao, Bicheng Zhang, Huijuan He, Yongjie Shui, Wenhong Xu, Chaogen Jiang, Li Shen, Qichun Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of brain glioma before postoperative radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaofeng ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Xiaofang LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Quzhou Central Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang 324000, P.R. China.
Bicheng ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Huijuan HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Quzhou Central Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang 324000, P.R. China.
Yongjie ShuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Wenhong XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Chaogen JiangDepartment of Radiology, Quzhou Central Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang 324000, P.R. China.
Li ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Qichun WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal radiation volume for high-grade glioma (HGG). The brain volume irradiated is associated with the extent of radiation neurotoxicity. When reducing the treatment volume, the risk of geographic tumor miss should be considered. In such cases, the recurrence patterns and, particularly, the rate of marginal tumor recurrence, are important indices for determining the optimal radiation volume. In the present study, a smaller-target delineation protocol with limited margins was adopted. The postoperative enhancing tumor and resection cavity were defined as gross tumor volume (GTV); 1 and 2 cm were added to the GTV to create clinical target volume (CTV1 and CTV2), which received 60 and 54 Gy, respectively. At a median follow-up of 14 months, 54 HGG patients developed tumor recurrence. The median overall and progression-free survival were 14 and 10.5 months, respectively. A total of 34 patients developed central recurrence, 8 presented with in-field recurrence, 2 developed marginal recurrence, 2 had distant recurrence and 11 patients developed cerebrospinal fluid dissemination, 2 of whom developed central recurrence, with 1 patient simultaneously developing marginal recurrence. Local recurrence (central and in-field) was found to be the main recurrence pattern. As the rate of marginal recurrence was low (<5%), it appears that the smaller irradiated volume in the present study was appropriate. However, clinical trials investigating limited irradiation volume are required to validate our findings.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyhigh-grade gliomairradiated volumerecurrence patterns

Identifiers

PMID27446566
PMCPMC4950878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.