ArticleOncology letters2016
Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macrophage plasticity in the osteosarcoma tumor microenvironment: opportunities and challenges for immunotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The strategies and advances of mRNA translation booster.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Review
- Advancements in Osteosarcoma Therapy: Overcoming Chemotherapy Resistance and Exploring Novel Pharmacological Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Osteosarcoma immune microenvironment: cellular struggle and novel therapeutic insights.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The efficacy and applicability of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-based regimens for primary bone tumors: A comprehensive review of current evidence.Journal of bone oncology · 2024Review
- Advances on immunotherapy for osteosarcoma.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Review
- Lactate Exposure Promotes Immunosuppressive Phenotypes in Innate Immune Cells.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2020Article
- Profiles of immune cell infiltration and immune-related genes in the tumor microenvironment of osteosarcoma.Aging · 2020Article
- Innate Immune Cells: A Potential and Promising Cell Population for Treating Osteosarcoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Current and Emerging Targets in Immunotherapy for Osteosarcoma.Journal of oncology · 2019Review
- T-Cell-Based Immunotherapy for Osteosarcoma: Challenges and Opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapy with tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) is one of the breakthrough strategies used in the treatment of cancer. However, DC-based immunotherapies for osteosarcoma are limited. In the present study, preclinical studies of a C3H osteosarcoma mouse model (produced by subcutaneous injection of LM8 murine osteosarcoma cells) validated the concept that LM8 cell lysate-pulsed bone marrow-derived DCs may evoke a more potent immune response compared with DCs that have been matured using polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly I:C). A cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response was established using two groups of C3H mice (n=9) with osteosarcoma; the treatment group consisted of LM8 cell lysate-pulsed DCs and the control group consisted of DCs matured using poly I:C. Each group was immunized with doses of 1×10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.