ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2016
Incisal margin condition after LEEP for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients and prognosis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hysteroscopic cervical biopsy for women with persistent human papillomavirus infection after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between incisal condition after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) operation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) patients and prognosis. A study of high-risk incisal margin positive cases was also performed. We compared the differences in the prognosis of the 1-year follow-up visit in the 120 CIN patients admitted to the hospital during the period from April 2013 to April 2014. A total of 43 cases of positive incisal margin (35.8%), and 77 negative cases were included in the study. The differences in age, course of disease, and CIN level between the two groups showed no statistical significance (P>0.05). In the positive group, the positive ratio was significantly higher than that of the negative group (P<0.05). The positive incisal margin showed a significant positive correlation with human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity (r=0.327, P=0.035). The condition of most patients with positive incisal margin and HPV was critical, which was followed by positive incisal margin and negative HPV. The patients with the best prognosis were those with significant negative incisal margin as well as HPV (P<0.05). In conclusion, the positive incisal margin after LEEP operation was associated with relapse of the disease. Thus, considering the HPV test into consideration is valuable for the prognosis of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.