ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016
Phylogenetic Insights into Chinese Rubus (Rosaceae) from Multiple Chloroplast and Nuclear DNAs.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omics analyses shed lights on the evolution and fruit development of Chinese raspberries (Rubus spp.).Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Comparative genomics on chloroplasts of ChineseFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- PhytoKeys · 2025Article
- Metabolomics, phytohormone and transcriptomics strategies to reveal the mechanism of barley heading date regulation to responds different photoperiod.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- A high-quality genome assembly reveals adaptations underlying glossy, wax-coated leaves in the heat-tolerant wild raspberry Rubus leucanthus.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024Article
- Chromosome-scale genome, together with transcriptome and metabolome, provides insights into the evolution and anthocyanin biosynthesis ofHorticulture research · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitogenome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- PhytoKeys · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of red raspberry (Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Phylogeny of the Diploid Species ofGenes · 2023Article
- Genome Assembly and Population Resequencing Reveal the Geographical Divergence of Shanmei (Rubus corchorifolius).Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Phylotranscriptomics reveal the spatio-temporal distribution and morphological evolution of Macrozamia, an Australian endemic genus of Cycadales.Annals of botany · 2022Article
- Study on SupergenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Exploring the diversity of andean berries from northern Peru based on molecular analyses.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of Rubus species (Rosaceae) and comparative analysis within the genus.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Rubus hirsutus Thunb. and a comparative analysis within Rubus species.Genetica · 2021Article
- Combined transcriptomic and metabolic analyses reveal potential mechanism for fruit development and quality control of Chinese raspberry (Rubus chingii Hu).Plant cell reports · 2021Article
- Diversity and authentication ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
- Integrative Taxonomy of the Spinous Assassin Bug GenusInsects · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rubus L. is a large and taxonomically complex genus, species of which exhibit apomixis, polyploidy, and frequent hybridization. Most of Chinese Rubus are assigned in two major sections, Idaeobatus and Malachobatus. To explore the phylogenetic relationships within Chinese Rubus, inferences upon three chloroplast DNA (rbcL, rpl20-rps12, and trnG-trnS), nuclear ribosomal ITS, and two low-copy nuclear markers (GBSSI-2 and PEPC) were deduced in 142 Rubus taxa from 17 subsections in 6 sections. nrITS and GBSSI-2 were the most informative among the six DNA regions assessed. Phylogenetic relationships within Rubus were well-resolved by combined nuclear datasets rather than chloroplast markers. The phylogenetic inferences strongly supported that section Idaeobatus was a polyphyletic group with four distant clades. All samples of sect. Malachobatus formed a monophyletic clade, in which R. tsangorum and R. amphidasys of sect. Dalibardastrum, and R. peltatus from subsection Peltati of sect. Idaeobatus were always nested. Rubus pentagonus (2n = 2x = 14) from subsect. Alpestres of sect. Idaeobatus was a sister group to the polyploid sect. Malachobatus, as well as the polytomy of three sect. Cyalctis members. This suggests that some polyploids of Malachobatus might originate from common ancestors, via polyploidization of hybrids between R. pentagonus and sect. Cylactis species. They had experienced species explosion in a short time. Section Dalibardastrum species have potential parental lineages from subsects. Moluccani and Stipulosi of sect. Malachobatus. Based on molecular phylogenies, we also provided recommendations for the taxonomic treatments of four taxa. In addition, our results showed certain incongruence between chloroplast and nuclear markers, which might be due to hybridization and introgression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.