ReviewFrontiers in plant science2016
Assessing Utilization and Environmental Risks of Important Genes in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive Evaluation of the Physiological Responses and Cold Tolerance of Annual Shoots from Different Sweet Cherry (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- From rhizome diffusion to programmable architecture: a systems framework for controllable spatial expansion in bamboo and other clonal plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Constructing pathways for glycine betaine in cross-domain ecological restoration: a bibliometric analysis.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Transcription elongation factor AtSPT4-2 positively modulates salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- The roles of plant proteases and protease inhibitors in drought response: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Proteomic Profile of Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean under Combined Herbicide and Drought Stress Conditions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses of yellow horn (Xanthoceras sorbifolia) in response to cold stress.PloS one · 2020Article
- Overexpression of a Novel Arabidopsis GeneFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- …Fell Upas Sits, the Hydra-Tree of DeathMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Article
- Characterization of3 Biotech · 2018Article
- Halophytes: Potential Resources for Salt Stress Tolerance Genes and Promoters.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Review
- Impact of TransgenicFrontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Overexpression of GmFDL19 enhances tolerance to drought and salt stresses in soybean.PloS one · 2017Article
- A Novel Two-Step Method for Screening Shade Tolerant Mutant Plants via Dwarfism.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transgenic plants with improved salt and drought stress tolerance have been developed with a large number of abiotic stress-related genes. Among these, the most extensively used genes are the glycine betaine biosynthetic codA, the DREB transcription factors, and vacuolar membrane Na(+)/H(+) antiporters. The use of codA, DREBs, and Na(+)/H(+) antiporters in transgenic plants has conferred stress tolerance and improved plant phenotype. However, the future deployment and commercialization of these plants depend on their safety to the environment. Addressing environmental risk assessment is challenging since mechanisms governing abiotic stress tolerance are much more complex than that of insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits, which have been considered to date. Therefore, questions arise, whether abiotic stress tolerance genes need additional considerations and new measurements in risk assessment and, whether these genes would have effects on weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic plants? While considering these concerns, the environmental risk assessment of abiotic stress tolerance genes would need to focus on the magnitude of stress tolerance, plant phenotype and characteristics of the potential receiving environment. In the present review, we discuss environmental concerns and likelihood of concerns associated with the use of abiotic stress tolerance genes. Based on our analysis, we conclude that the uses of these genes in domesticated crop plants are safe for the environment. Risk assessment, however, should be carefully conducted on biofeedstocks and perennial plants taking into account plant phenotype and the potential receiving environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.