Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27446034›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Comparison of the Effects of Environmental Parameters on the Growth Variability of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Coupled with Strain Sources and Genotypes Analyses.

Bingxuan Liu, Haiquan Liu, Yingjie Pan, Jing Xie, Yong Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transcriptomic Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Adaptations ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison on the Growth Variability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bingxuan LiuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University Shanghai, China.
Haiquan LiuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean UniversityShanghai, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation, Ministry of AgricultureShanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic-Product Processing and PreservationShanghai, China.
Yingjie PanCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean UniversityShanghai, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation, Ministry of AgricultureShanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic-Product Processing and PreservationShanghai, China.
Jing XieCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean UniversityShanghai, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation, Ministry of AgricultureShanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic-Product Processing and PreservationShanghai, China.
Yong ZhaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean UniversityShanghai, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation, Ministry of AgricultureShanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic-Product Processing and PreservationShanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial growth variability plays an important role on food safety risk assessment. In this study, the growth kinetic characteristics corresponding to maximum specific growth rate (μmax) of 50 V. parahaemolyticus isolates from different sources and genotypes were evaluated at different temperatures (10, 20, 30, and 37°C) and salinity (0.5, 3, 5, 7, and 9%) using the automated turbidimetric system Bioscreen C. The results demonstrated that strain growth variability increased as the growth conditions became more stressful both in terms of temperature and salinity. The coefficient of variation (CV) of μmax for temperature was larger than that for salinity, indicating that the impact of temperature on strain growth variability was greater than that of salinity. The strains isolated from freshwater aquatic products had more conspicuous growth variations than those from seawater. Moreover, the strains with tlh (+) /tdh (+) /trh (-) exhibited higher growth variability than tlh (+) /tdh (-) /trh (-) or tlh (+) /tdh (-) /trh (+), revealing that gene heterogeneity might have possible relations with the growth variability. This research illustrates that the growth environments, strain sources as well as genotypes have impacts on strain growth variability of V. parahaemolyticus, which can be helpful for incorporating strain variability in predictive microbiology and microbial risk assessment.

Indexed as

environmental factorgene heterogeneitygrowth variabilitymaximum growth ratesalinitytemperatureVibrio parahemolyticus

Identifiers

PMID27446034
PMCPMC4917555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.