Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27445818›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2016

Arctigenin Treatment Protects against Brain Damage through an Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Apoptotic Mechanism after Needle Insertion.

Jie Song, Na Li, Yang Xia, Zhong Gao, Sa-Feng Zou, Liang Kong, Ying-Jia Yao, Ya-Nan Jiao, Yu-Hui Yan, Shao-Heng Li and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Arctigenin: pharmacology, total synthesis, and progress in structure modification.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neuroprotective Effects of an Aqueous Extract ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. 28-Day Oral Chronic Toxicity Study ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie SongSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Na LiSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Yang XiaDepartment of Engineering, St. Cross College, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Zhong GaoDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital Dalian, China.
Sa-Feng ZouDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital Dalian, China.
Liang KongSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Ying-Jia YaoSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Ya-Nan JiaoSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Yu-Hui YanSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Shao-Heng LiSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Zhen-Yu TaoSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Guan LianSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Jing-Xian YangSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Ting-Guo KangSchool of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Dalian, China.
Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNDalian Municipal Central Hospital · CNUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledConvection enhanced delivery (CED) infuses drugs directly into brain tissue. Needle insertion is required and results in a stab wound injury (SWI). Subsequent secondary injury involves the release of inflammatory and apoptotic cytokines, which have dramatic consequences on the integrity of damaged tissue, leading to the evolution of a pericontusional-damaged area minutes to days after in the initial injury. The present study investigated the capacity for arctigenin (ARC) to prevent secondary brain injury and the determination of the underlying mechanism of action in a mouse model of SWI that mimics the process of CED. After CED, mice received a gavage of ARC from 30 min to 14 days. Neurological severity scores (NSS) and wound closure degree were assessed after the injury. Histological analysis and immunocytochemistry were used to evaluated the extent of brain damage and neuroinflammation. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was used to detect universal apoptosis. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) was used to test the inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) content. Gene levels of inflammation (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) and apoptosis (Caspase-3, Bax and Bcl-2) were detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Using these, we analyzed ARC's efficacy and mechanism of action.

resultsARC treatment improved neurological function by reducing brain water content and hematoma and accelerating wound closure relative to untreated mice. ARC treatment reduced the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 and the number of allograft inflammatory factor (IBA)- and myeloperoxidase (MPO)-positive cells and increased the levels of IL-10. ARC-treated mice had fewer TUNEL+ apoptotic neurons and activated caspase-3-positive neurons surrounding the lesion than controls, indicating increased neuronal survival.

conclusionsARC treatment confers neuroprotection of brain tissue through anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects in a mouse model of SWI. These results suggest a new strategy for promoting neuronal survival and function after CED to improve long-term patient outcome.

Indexed as

apoptosisarctigeninconvection enhanced deliveryinflammationstab wound injurytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID27445818
PMCPMC4916177
OpenAlexW2469869855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.