Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27445661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Decreased Speech-In-Noise Understanding in Young Adults with Tinnitus.

Annick Gilles, Winny Schlee, Sarah Rabau, Kristien Wouters, Erik Fransen, Paul Van de Heyning

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Subcortical auditory system in tinnitus with normal hearing: insights from electrophysiological perspective.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Auditory brainstem response in unilateral tinnitus patients: does symmetrical hearing thresholds and within-subject comparison affect responses?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Auditory processing in normally hearing individuals with and without tinnitus: assessment with four psychoacoustic tests.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annick GillesUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University HospitalEdegem, Belgium; Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AntwerpWilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human and Social Welfare, University College GhentGhent, Belgium.
Winny SchleeUniversity Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz Konstanz, Germany.
Sarah RabauUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University HospitalEdegem, Belgium; Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AntwerpWilrijk, Belgium.
Kristien WoutersDepartment of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AntwerpWilrijk, Belgium; University Department of Scientific Coordination and Biostatistics, Antwerp University HospitalEdegem, Belgium.
Erik FransenDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp Wilrijk, Belgium.
Paul Van de HeyningUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University HospitalEdegem, Belgium; Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of AntwerpWilrijk, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesYoung people are often exposed to high music levels which make them more at risk to develop noise-induced symptoms such as hearing loss, hyperacusis, and tinnitus of which the latter is the symptom perceived the most by young adults. Although, subclinical neural damage was demonstrated in animal experiments, the human correlate remains under debate. Controversy exists on the underlying condition of young adults with normal hearing thresholds and noise-induced tinnitus (NIT) due to leisure noise. The present study aimed to assess differences in audiological characteristics between noise-exposed adolescents with and without NIT.

methodsA group of 87 young adults with a history of recreational noise exposure was investigated by use of the following tests: otoscopy, impedance measurements, pure-tone audiometry including high-frequencies, transient and distortion product otoacoustic emissions, speech-in-noise testing with continuous and modulated noise (amplitude-modulated by 15 Hz), auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and questionnaires.Nineteen students reported NIT due to recreational noise exposure, and their measures were compared to the non-tinnitus subjects.

resultsNo significant differences between tinnitus and non-tinnitus subjects could be found for hearing thresholds, otoacoustic emissions, and ABR results.Tinnitus subjects had significantly worse speech reception in noise compared to non-tinnitus subjects for sentences embedded in steady-state noise (mean speech reception threshold (SRT) scores, respectively -5.77 and -6.90 dB SNR; p = 0.025) as well as for sentences embedded in 15 Hz AM-noise (mean SRT scores, respectively -13.04 and -15.17 dB SNR; p = 0.013). In both groups speech reception was significantly improved during AM-15 Hz noise compared to the steady-state noise condition (p < 0.001). However, the modulation masking release was not affected by the presence of NIT.

conclusionsYoung adults with and without NIT did not differ regarding audiometry, OAE, and ABR.However, tinnitus patients showed decreased speech-in-noise reception. The results are discussed in the light of previous findings suggestion NIT may occur in the absence of measurable peripheral damage as reflected in speech-in-noise deficits in tinnitus subjects.

Indexed as

ABRhomeostatic plasticitynoise-induced tinnitusotoacoustic emissionsrecreational noise exposurespeech-in-noise testingspeech-in-noise understandingyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID27445661
PMCPMC4923253
OpenAlexW2464908554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.