ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2016
Evaluation of cone function by a handheld non-mydriatic flicker electroretinogram device.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nine-year ocular developmental outcomes after ranibizumab or laser treatment for zone II retinopathy of prematurity: follow-up of a randomized trial cohort.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Trial
- The Mydriasis-Free Handheld ERG Device and Its Utility in Clinical Practice: A Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Reference ranges of light-adapted full-field electroretinogram and associated factors in a large cohort of healthy school-aged children and adolescents.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Light-adapted electroretinograms of eyes with cataract recorded using the HE-2000 system before and after mydriasis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Could a hand-held, visual electrophysiology device theoretically reduce diagnostic waiting times for complex eye conditions in the NHS? A Discrete Event Simulation (DES) modelling study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The electroretinography to identify biomarkers of idiopathic hypersomnia and narcolepsy type 1.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Paediatric norms for photopic electroretinogram testing based on a large cohort of Chinese preschool children.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Analysis of skin and corneal fiber electrodes for electroretinogram assessments in patients with major depressive disorder.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Comparing the RETevalDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Novel Machine-Learning Based Framework Using Electroretinography Data for the Detection of Early-Stage Glaucoma.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- RDH5-Related Fundus Albipunctatus in a Large Japanese Cohort.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Electroretinographic recordings with skin electrodes to assess effects of vitrectomy with gas tamponade on eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Retinal function determined by flicker ERGs before and soon after intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents.BMC ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Hand-held, dilation-free, electroretinography in children under 3 years of age treated with vigabatrin.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Evaluation of light- and dark-adapted ERGs using a mydriasis-free, portable system: clinical classifications and normative data.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Effect of varying skin surface electrode position on electroretinogram responses recorded using a handheld stimulating and recording system.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2018Article
- New Mydriasis-Free Electroretinogram Recorded with Skin Electrodes in Healthy Subjects.BioMed research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFull-field electroretinograms (ERGs) are used to evaluate retinal function in patients with various types of hereditary and acquired retinal diseases. However, ERG recordings require relatively invasive procedures, including pupillary dilation and the use of contact lens electrodes. Thus, it would be helpful to have a simpler and noninvasive screening method. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a new, handheld, portable ERG device, RETeval™, can be used to screen patients for cone dysfunction. PATIENTS AND
methodsThirty-five eyes of 35 patients who had reduced cone responses ascertained by a conventional ERG system using contact lens electrodes were studied. The causative diseases included achromatopsia, cone dystrophy, cone-rod dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa, choroidal dystrophy, autoimmune retinopathy, and Stargardt disease. The flicker ERGs were recorded with the RETeval™ under undilated conditions with skin electrodes (stimulus strength, 3.0 cd·s/m(2); frequency, 28.3 Hz), and the responses were compared to that of 50 healthy eyes. The amplitudes and implicit times of the fundamental component of the flicker ERGs were analyzed in three age groups: Group A, ≤20 years; Group B, 21-40 years; and Group C, ≥41 years.
resultsIn all of the age groups, the amplitudes of the ERGs were significantly smaller and the implicit times significantly longer in patients with cone dysfunction than in the control eyes. All but one of the patients had flicker amplitudes lower than the mean -2.0 standard deviation of control eyes.
conclusionThe RETeval™ has a potential of being used to screen for cone dysfunction. The entire examination takes <5 minutes and does not require pupil dilatation or a contact lens electrode. Although the flicker responses do not provide information on the scotopic functions, the RETeval™ device can be used to determine which patients require additional full-field ERG testing with dilated pupils under both scotopic and photopic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.