Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27445151›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Gamma and Beta Oscillations Define a Sequence of Neurocognitive Modes Present in Odor Processing.

Donald E Frederick, Austin Brown, Elizabeth Brim, Nisarg Mehta, Mark Vujovic, Leslie M Kay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Early development of olfactory circuit function.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Donald E FrederickDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Biology, and.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-8319
Austin BrownThe College, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Elizabeth BrimThe College, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Nisarg MehtaInstitute for Mind and Biology, and.
Mark VujovicInstitute for Mind and Biology, and.
Leslie M KayDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Biology, and The College, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 lkay@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-477X

Funding

CRCNS: Dynamical mechanisms of oscillation transitions in the olfactory systemR01DC014367 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A, KAY, LESLIE M · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledOlfactory system beta (15-35 Hz) and gamma (40-110 Hz) oscillations of the local field potential in mammals have both been linked to odor learning and discrimination. Gamma oscillations represent the activity of a local network within the olfactory bulb, and beta oscillations represent engagement of a systemwide network. Here, we test whether beta and gamma oscillations represent different cognitive modes using the different demands of go/no-go and two-alternative choice tasks that previously were suggested to favor beta or gamma oscillations, respectively. We reconcile previous studies and show that both beta and gamma oscillations occur in both tasks, with gamma dominating the early odor sampling period (2-4 sniffs) and beta dominating later. The relative power and coherence of both oscillations depend separately on multiple factors within both tasks without categorical differences across tasks. While the early/gamma-associated period occurs in all trials, rats can perform above chance without the later/beta-associated period. Longer sampling, which includes beta oscillations, is associated with better performance. Gamma followed by beta oscillations therefore represents a sequence of cognitive and neural states during odor discrimination, which can be separately modified depending on the demands of a task and odor discrimination. Additionally, fast (85 Hz) and slow (70 Hz) olfactory bulb gamma oscillation sub-bands have been hypothesized to represent tufted and mitral cell networks, respectively (Manabe and Mori, 2013). We find that fast gamma favors the early and slow gamma the later (beta-dominated) odor-sampling period and that the relative contributions of these oscillations are consistent across tasks. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Olfactory system gamma (40-110 Hz) and beta (15-35 Hz) oscillations of the local field potential indicate different neural firing statistics and functional circuits. We show that gamma and beta oscillations occur in stereotyped sequence during odor sampling in associative tasks, with local gamma dominating the first 250 ms of odor sniffing, followed by systemwide beta as behavioral responses are prepared. Oscillations and coupling strength between brain regions are modulated by task, odor, and learning, showing that task features can dramatically adjust the dynamics of a cortical sensory system, which changes state every ∼250 ms. Understanding cortical circuits, even at the biophysical level, depends on careful use of multiple behavioral contexts and stimuli.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsBeta RhythmBrainBrain MappingChoice BehaviorDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectroencephalographyGamma RhythmMaleOlfactory PathwaysRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySmellcoherenceneural oscillationolfactory bulbpiriform cortex

Identifiers

PMID27445151
PMCPMC4951578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.