Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444983›Full record

SynthesisContraception2016

Co-administration of St. John's wort and hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review.

Erin N Berry-Bibee, Myong-Jin Kim, Naomi K Tepper, Halley E M Riley, Kathryn M Curtis

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Contraception, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. PXR as a mediator of herb-drug interaction.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin N Berry-BibeeDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: wnw4@cdc.gov.
Myong-Jin KimOffice of Clinical Pharmacology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Naomi K TepperDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Halley E M RileyDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kathryn M CurtisDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSt. John's wort (SJW) is a known strong inducer of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3 A4 enzyme, and both the ethinyl estradiol and progestin components of hormonal contraceptives are substrates of CYP3A4. This systematic review examined whether the co-administration of SJW and hormonal contraceptives leads to significant safety or efficacy concerns. STUDY

designSystematic review.

methodsPubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles of any comparative study design (clinical or pharmacokinetic) that examined potential interactions between SJW and hormonal contraceptives in women of reproductive age.

resultsOf the 48 identified articles, four studies met inclusion criteria and compared use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) alone to the use of COCs co-administered with SJW. Two studies demonstrated no change in markers of ovulation, but one study demonstrated increased follicular growth and probable ovulation when COCs were co-administered with SJW. Three studies demonstrated an increased risk of breakthrough bleeding with COCs and SJW. Three studies showed changes in at least one pharmacokinetic parameter that suggested a significantly decreased exposure to hormone concentrations when COCs were co-administered with SJW. The only study that did not demonstrate any significant pharmacokinetic differences examined a SJW product containing a low amount of hypericin.

conclusionLimited evidence showing increased risk of ovulation and breakthrough bleeding raises concern for decreased contraceptive efficacy when COCs are co-administered with SJW. The pharmacokinetic evidence is mixed but suggests that SJW administration may be associated with weak to moderate induction of the metabolism of COCs.

Indexed as

Herb-Drug InteractionsContraceptives, Oral, CombinedContraceptives, Oral, HormonalDepressionFemaleHumansHypericumMetrorrhagiaOvulationPlant ExtractsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentContraceptives, Oral, CombinedContraceptives, Oral, HormonalPlant ExtractsDepressionDrug interactionsHormonal contraceptionHypericum perforatumSt. John's wort

Identifiers

PMID27444983
PMCPMC11283811
OpenAlexW2484650117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.