Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444980›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2017

Development and Validation of a Small Animal Immobilizer and Positioning System for the Study of Delivery of Intracranial and Extracranial Radiotherapy Using the Gamma Knife System.

Musaddiq J Awan, Jennifer Dorth, Arvind Mani, Haksoo Kim, Yiran Zheng, Mazen Mislmani, Scott Welford, Jiankui Yuan, Barry W Wessels, Simon S Lo and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Musaddiq J Awan1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jennifer Dorth1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Arvind Mani2 Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Haksoo Kim1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Yiran Zheng1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mazen Mislmani1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Scott Welford1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jiankui Yuan1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Barry W Wessels1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Simon S Lo1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
John Letterio3 Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mitchell Machtay1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Andrew Sloan4 Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jason W Sohn1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTK12CA076917 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSON, STANTON L. · 1997 to 2022
$14.2M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA076917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to establish a process of irradiating mice using the Gamma Knife as a versatile system for small animal irradiation and to validate accurate intracranial and extracranial dose delivery using this system. A stereotactic immobilization device was developed for small animals for the Gamma Knife head frame allowing for isocentric dose delivery. Intercranial positional reproducibility of a reference point from a primary reference animal was verified on an additional mouse. Extracranial positional reproducibility of the mouse aorta was verified using 3 mice. Accurate dose delivery was validated using film and thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements with a solid water phantom. Gamma Knife plans were developed to irradiate intracranial and extracranial targets. Mice were irradiated validating successful targeted radiation dose delivery. Intramouse positional variability of the right mandible reference point across 10 micro-computed tomography scans was 0.65 ± 0.48 mm. Intermouse positional reproducibility across 2 mice at the same reference point was 0.76 ± 0.46 mm. The accuracy of dose delivery was 0.67 ± 0.29 mm and 1.01 ± 0.43 mm in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. The planned dose delivered to a mouse phantom was 2 Gy at the 50% isodose with a measured thermoluminescent dosimeter dose of 2.9 ± 0.3 Gy. The phosphorylated form of member X of histone family H2A (γH2AX) staining of irradiated mouse brain and mouse aorta demonstrated adjacent tissue sparing. In conclusion, our system for preclinical studies of small animal irradiation using the Gamma Knife is able to accurately deliver intracranial and extracranial targeted focal radiation allowing for preclinical experiments studying focal radiation.

Indexed as

Gamma RaysHead MovementsPatient PositioningRadiosurgeryAnimalsCranial IrradiationDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceRadiometryRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Resultsconformal radiotherapypreclinical modelsradiation biologyradiation physicssmall animal irradiation

Identifiers

PMID27444980
PMCPMC5616031
OpenAlexW2502643561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.