ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Comparison of mini-gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in a mainly super-obese patient group: first results.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Single- and Two-step Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in the Setting of Obesity with ≥ 50 kg/mObesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity.Obesity surgery · 2020Pooled it
- One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese Patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/mObesity surgery · 2019Pooled it
- One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass Is Now an Established Bariatric Procedure: a Systematic Review of 12,807 Patients.Obesity surgery · 2018Pooled it
- [Evidence of the Mini-/One-anastomosis-gastric-Bypass for being a standard procedure in obesity and metabolic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial.Obesity surgery · 2018Trial
- Evaluation of 1-year follow-up data of reoperative sleeve gastrectomy and one-anastomosis gastric bypass after laparoscopic gastric plication.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and the Risk of De Novo or Persistent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Patients With a BMI ≥50 kg/mJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2025Review
- One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of nutritional, anthropometric, and psychological outcomes in different metabolic and bariatric surgery techniques: a follow up study.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- The One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Is a Suitable Alternative to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Body Mass Index ≥50 kg/m2: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Obesity facts · 2025Article
- Comparison of One-Year Outcomes in Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in a Single Bariatric Unit.Cureus · 2024Article
- Effect of different bariatric surgery methods on metabolic syndrome in patients with severe obesity.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Challenges in the care and treatment of patients with extreme obesity.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhereas sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in its beginnings was mainly performed to treat super-obesity, it has become as popular as gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity of any class. In contrast to this, the persisting problems of early staple line leaks and poor long-term results of SG regarding weight loss and new onset of gastroesophageal reflux have become increasingly obvious. The mini-gastric bypass (MGB) with its low complication rates and possibly better long-term results may be a good alternative to SG, especially in super-obesity.
methodsIn this context, two groups of mostly super-obese patients (SG and MGB) of a single bariatric center were retrospectively analyzed and compared for perioperative and early postoperative outcomes.
resultsBetween August 2007 and March 2015, 169 patients underwent MGB, while 118 patients were operated by SG. Both groups were comparable for BMI at baseline (MGB = 54.1 kg/m
conclusionsMGB achieved superior weight loss at 1 year and had a lower 30-day complication rate in comparison with SG for super-obese patients. Thus, MGB might be superior to SG regarding the treatment of super-obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.