Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444790›Full record

ArticleBiology open2016

Outperforming hummingbirds' load-lifting capability with a lightweight hummingbird-like flapping-wing mechanism.

Frederik Leys, Dominiek Reynaerts, Dirk Vandepitte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frederik LeysDepartment of Mechanical Engineering,  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300, Box 2420, Leuven 3001, Belgium Frederik.Leys@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-0734
Dominiek ReynaertsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering,  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300, Box 2420, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Dirk VandepitteDepartment of Mechanical Engineering,  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300, Box 2420, Leuven 3001, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stroke-cam flapping mechanism presented in this paper closely mimics the wing motion of a hovering Rufous hummingbird. It is the only lightweight hummingbird-sized flapping mechanism which generates a harmonic wing stroke with both a high flapping frequency and a large stroke amplitude. Experiments on a lightweight prototype of this stroke-cam mechanism on a 50 mm-long wing demonstrate that a harmonic stroke motion is generated with a peak-to-peak stroke amplitude of 175° at a flapping frequency of 40 Hz. It generated a mass lifting capability of 5.1 g, which is largely sufficient to lift the prototype's mass of 3.39 g and larger than the mass-lifting capability of a Rufous hummingbird. The motor mass of a hummingbird-like robot which drives the stroke-cam mechanism is considerably larger (about five times) than the muscle mass of a hummingbird with comparable load-lifting capability. This paper presents a flapping wing nano aerial vehicle which is designed to possess the same lift- and thrust-generating principles of the Rufous hummingbird. The application is indoor flight. We give an overview of the wing kinematics and some specifications which should be met to develop an artificial wing, and also describe the applications of these in the mechanism which has been developed in this work.

Indexed as

FlappingLightweightMechanismRufous hummingbirdStroke-camTrochilidaeWing

Identifiers

PMID27444790
PMCPMC5004601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.