Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444510›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Incidence and Predictors of Complications During Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Emily N Guhl, Donald Siddoway, Evan Adelstein, Raveen Bazaz, George S Mendenhall, Jan Nemec, Samir Saba, David Schwartzman, Andrew Voigt, Norman C Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Safety and long-term efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in octogenarians: a multicenter experience.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Indications and Techniques.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Repeat procedure is a new independent predictor of complications of atrial fibrillation ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Safety and efficacy of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation using the second-generation cryoballoon.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018
    Article
  17. Complications of Atrial Fibrillation Cryoablation.Journal of atrial fibrillation · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: Overcoming Complications and Improving Success.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2017
    Review
  20. Single freeze strategy with the second- generation cryballoon for atrial fibrillation: a multicenter international retrospective analysis in a large cohort of patients.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily N GuhlCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Donald SiddowayCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Evan AdelsteinCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Raveen BazazCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
George S MendenhallCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jan NemecCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Samir SabaCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
David SchwartzmanCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Andrew VoigtCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Norman C WangCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sandeep K JainCenter for Atrial Fibrillation, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA jainsk@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an alternative to radiofrequency PVI for atrial fibrillation (AF). Data are lacking to define the rates and predictors of complications, particularly phrenic nerve injury (PNI). METHODS AND

resultsWe evaluated a single-center prospective registry of 450 consecutive patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI between 2011 and 2015. Patients were 59±10 years old, 26% were women, 58% had hypertension, their mean CHA2DS2VASc score was 1.7±1.3, 30% had persistent atrial fibrillation, and 92% received a second-generation 28-mm balloon. Predefined major complications were persistent PNI, pericardial effusion, deep vein thrombosis, arteriovenous fistula, atrioesophageal fistula, bleeding requiring transfusion, stroke, and death. PNI was categorized as persistent if it persisted after discharge from the laboratory. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of complications and specifically PNI. We identified a major complication in 10 (2.2%) patients. In 49 (10.8%) patients, at least transient PNI was observed; only 5 persisted beyond the procedure (1.1%). All cases of PNI resolved eventually, with the longest time to resolution being 48 days. We also describe 2 cases of PNI manifesting after the index hospitalization. Regression analysis identified 23-mm balloon use (16.3% versus 5.2%, odds ratio 2.94, P=0.011) and increased age (62.8±7.7 versus 58.7±0.12 years, odds ratio 1.058, P=0.014) as independent significant predictors of PNI. There were no significant predictors of major complications.

conclusionsIn a large contemporary cohort, cryoballoon PVI is associated with low procedural risk, including lower rates of PNI than previously reported. Older age and 23-mm balloon use were associated with PNI. Our low rate of PNI may reflect more sensitive detection methods, including compound motor action potential monitoring and forced double-deflation.

Indexed as

CryosurgeryRegistriesAgedArteriovenous FistulaAtrial FibrillationBlood TransfusionCohort StudiesEsophageal FistulaFemaleHemorrhageHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Agedablationatrial fibrillationcatheter ablationcomplications

Identifiers

PMID27444510
PMCPMC5015404
OpenAlexW2498851739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.