Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444370›Full record

ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2016

Surgical tissue handling methods to optimize ex vivo fluorescence with the activatable optical probe γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green.

Toshiko Harada, Yuko Nakamura, Kazuhide Sato, Tadanobu Nagaya, Peter L Choyke, Yasuyuki Seto, Hisataka Kobayashi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshiko HaradaMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD20892, USA.
Yuko NakamuraMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD20892, USA.
Kazuhide SatoMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD20892, USA.
Tadanobu NagayaMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD20892, USA.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD20892, USA.
Yasuyuki SetoDepartment of Stomach and Esophageal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113, Japan.
Hisataka KobayashiMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD20892, USA.
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Growth Factor Imaging and PhotoimmunotherapyZIABC010656 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2024
$31.6M
Intracellular In vivo ImagingZIABC010657 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$20.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical fluorescence imaging has been developed as an aid to intraoperative diagnosis to improve surgical and endoscopic procedures. Compared with other intraoperative imaging methods, it is lower in cost, has a high safety margin, is portable and easy to use. γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green (gGlu-HMRG) is a recently developed activatable fluorescence probe that emits strong fluorescence in the presence of the enzyme γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), which is overexpressed in many cancers, including ovarian cancer. Ex vivo testing is important for clinical approval of such probes. The diagnostic performance of gGlu-HMRG in fresh excised surgical specimens has been reported; however, details of tissue handling have not been optimized. In this study, we investigated four different tissue handling procedures to optimize imaging in excised tumor specimens. The fluorescence intensity time courses after the different tissue handling methods were compared. Additionally, the fluorescence positive areas were correlated with the presence of red fluorescent protein (RFP) in an RFP positive cell line as the standard of reference for cancer location. In the 'intact' groups, tumors yielded quick and homogeneous activation of gGlu-HMRG. In the 'rinse' and 'cut' groups, the fluorescence intensity of the tumor was a little lower than that in the intact group. In the 'pressed' groups, however, fluorescence intensity from gGlu-HMRG was lower over the entire time course, suggesting a decrease or relocation of excreted GGT. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the method of tissue handling prior to ex vivo imaging with the activatable probe gGlu-HMRG has a strong influence on the signal derived from the specimen. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Fluorescent Dyesgamma-GlutamyltransferaseHumansIntraoperative PeriodNeoplasmsOptical ImagingRhodaminesSpecimen HandlingFluorescent Dyesgamma-GlutamyltransferaseRhodaminesfluorescent probeoptical navigation surgeryovarian cancersurgical specimenγ-glutamyl transpeptidase

Identifiers

PMID27444370
PMCPMC6467211
OpenAlexW2483014046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.