ArticleJMIR research protocols2016
Evaluation of the Digital Alzheimer Center: Testing Usability and Usefulness of an Online Portal for Patients with Dementia and Their Carers.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Active Involvement of People with Dementia: A Systematic Review of Studies Developing Supportive Technologies.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2019Pooled it
- Internet-Based Interventions Aimed at Supporting Family Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- New perspectives on peer support in an online intervention for family carers of people living with dementia-evidence from an Irish NGO.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Website on Learning Disorders for Parents and Learning Therapists: Observational Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Technology for activity participation in older people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: expert perspectives and a scoping review.Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2023Article
- Evaluating the pragmatic characteristics of advance care planning outcome measures in dementia clinical trials: A scoping review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Article
- The Experiences of Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia in Web-Based Psychoeducation Programs: Systematic Review and Metasynthesis.JMIR aging · 2023Review
- HomeCoRe system for telerehabilitation in individuals at risk of dementia: A usability and user experience study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Mobile Phone Use by People with Mild to Moderate Dementia: Uncovering Challenges and Identifying Opportunities: Mobile Phone Use by People with Mild to Moderate Dementia.ASSETS. Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies · 2022Article
- Web-Based Technologies to Support Carers of People Living With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Digital Health Tools for a Pediatric Patient Registry: Semistructured Interviews and Interface Usability Testing With Parents and Clinicians.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Online Educational Tools for Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Scoping Literature Review.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2021Article
- Conceptualizing Usability for the eHealth Context: Content Analysis of Usability Problems of eHealth Applications.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Effects of e-Health Training and Social Support Interventions for Informal Caregivers of People with Dementia-A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- I-CARE-An Interaction System for the Individual Activation of People with Dementia.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- HomeCoRe for Telerehabilitation in Mild or Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Feasibility-Usability Study of a Tablet App Adapted Specifically for Persons with Cognitive Impairment-SMART4MD (Support Monitoring and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- A Mobile Patient-Reported Outcome Measure App With Talking Touchscreen: Usability Assessment.JMIR formative research · 2019Article
- Effect of Different Sources Support on Adaptation in Families of Patient With Moderate-to-Severe Dementia in China.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDementia is a progressive and highly disabling neurodegenerative disease that will likely become highly prevalent in the future due to the globally aging population. To improve health care efficiency and quality for dementia care, eHealth could help with, for example, an online portal, such as the Digital Alzheimer Center (DAC) of the Vrije Universiteit Medical Center Amsterdam. It provides up-to-date disease information, peer-to-peer contact, and methods for contacting the hospital and health professionals.
objectiveWe aimed to investigate the usability and usefulness of the DAC for patients with dementia and carers to get insight into the feasibility and value of this eHealth app in dementia care and to recommend potential improvements.
methodsA descriptive study among patients, carers, and health care professionals was performed. Mixed methods were used, consisting of observations (n=10, 4 people with dementia, 6 carers), an online survey (n=287; 88 patients, 199 carers), and semistructured interviews (n=18; 6 patients, 6 carers, 6 health care professionals). During the observations, participants performed a set of five different prescribed tasks on the portal. Speed, number of errors, and navigation were noted. The online survey aimed to assess users' opinions on the portal's usability and usefulness. Semistructured interviews were conducted in a subsample of patients, carers, and health care professionals to gain more in-depth information.
resultsIn the usability assessment, eight categories of errors were distinguished, of which three were of critical, two of medium, and three of low severity. In the survey, 45% (40/88) of the patients and 53% (105/199) of the carers indicated they used the portal. In all, 33% (12/36) of patients and 61% (62/102) of carers found it easy to learn to work with the portal. Most considered the DAC generally useful: 65% (17/26) of patients and 78% (67/86) of carers found the DAC useful, especially for understanding dementia (patients: 64%, 16/25; carers: 62%, 53/86). In the semistructured interviews, the site was generally rated positively on usability and usefulness and being well designed. People with dementia and carers indicated it helped them to understand and deal with dementia.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the usability and usefulness of an Internet portal especially designed for people with dementia and their carers. An online patient portal could be a useful means to help to support patients and carers in dealing with dementia: the majority of users positively evaluated usability and usefulness of the portal, and appreciated the information on it. However, only a minority of patients found it easy to work with the portal. Good design and frequent usability testing is essential to offer a good online portal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.