Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444184›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2016

Preliminary human health risk assessment of arsenic and fluoride in tap water from Zacatecas, México.

Mónica I Martínez-Acuña, Marisa Mercado-Reyes, Jorge A Alegría-Torres, José J Mejía-Saavedra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Global groundwater contamination by geogenic fluoride.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Fluorides in water for consumption in northern and western Mexico].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. The Development of FeGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. As andEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Natural and Anthropogenic Arsenic Sources in Groundwater Flow Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mónica I Martínez-AcuñaUnidad Académica de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico.
Marisa Mercado-ReyesUnidad Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico.
Jorge A Alegría-TorresLaboratorio de Investigación Molecular en Nutrición LIMON, Universidad del Centro de México, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
José J Mejía-SaavedraToxicología Ambiental, CIACYT-Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Avenida Sierra Leona No. 550, Colonia Lomas Segunda Sección, CP 78210, San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico. jjesus@uaslp.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zacatecas state is located in the central area of Mexico, where the underground water contains elevated quantities of natural arsenic and fluoride. In order to estimate health risk associated with human exposure to these pollutants, tap water samples from the southern-central region of the state were analyzed. Ninety percent of the samples exceeded the levels of arsenic established by the World Health Organization (WHO) of 0.01 mg/L and 43 % exceeded the limit established by the NOM-127-SSA1(1) of 0.025 mg/L. Forty-three percent of the samples had fluoride levels above the Mexican regulation limit of 1.5 mg/L (NOM-127-SSA1). We used WHO and EPA's health risk assessment method, we estimated 80 % of the inhabitants of sites studied could be exposed to arsenic levels higher than those recommended by EPA and the WHO, 22 % could be exposed to fluoride levels higher than those recommended by EPA, and 16 % of the local population may be in risk of suffering dental fluorosis.

Indexed as

ArsenicDrinking WaterEnvironmental MonitoringFluoridesFluorosis, DentalGroundwaterHumansMexicoRisk AssessmentWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater SupplyArsenicDrinking WaterFluoridesWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicFluorideRisk assessmentWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.