Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444182›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2016

Strategies to Improve Medication Adherence in Older Persons: Consensus Statement from the Senior Italia Federanziani Advisory Board.

Alessandra Marengoni, Alessandro Monaco, Elisio Costa, Antonio Cherubini, Alexandra Prados-Torres, Christiane Muth, Renè J F Melis, Luca Pasina, Tischa J M van der Cammen, Katie Palmer and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alessandra MarengoniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123, Brescia, Italy. alessandra.marengoni@unibs.it.
Alessandro MonacoItalian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy.
Elisio CostaUCIBIO, REQUIMTE and Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Antonio CherubiniGeriatrics and Geriatric Emergency Care, IRCCS-INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Alexandra Prados-TorresIIS Aragón, Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.
Christiane MuthInstitute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Renè J F MelisDepartment of Geriatric Medicine/Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Luca PasinaLaboratory for Quality Assessment of Geriatric Therapies and Services, Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy.
Tischa J M van der CammenSection of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Katie PalmerSan Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy.
Sergio PecorelliUniversity of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Graziano OnderDepartment of Geriatrics, Centro Medicina dell'Invecchiamento, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor adherence to treatment regimens has long been recognized as a substantial roadblock to achieving better outcomes for patients. Non-adherence to medications affects the quality and length of life and has been associated with negative health outcomes and increasing healthcare costs. The problem of non-adherence is particularly troublesome in older patients who are affected by multiple chronic diseases and for this reason receive multiple treatments. To date, no single intervention strategy has been shown to be effective in improving adherence across all patients, conditions, and settings. Between September and October 2014, a group of experts in geriatrics, pharmacology, epidemiology, and public health applied a modified RAND appropriateness method to reach a consensus on the possible best interventions to improve adherence in older individuals. Seven interventions were identified, classified based on their target (patient, therapy, and public health/society): (1) Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, (2) patient (and caregiver) education to improve patient empowerment, (3) optimization of treatment, (4) use of adherence aids, (5) physician and other healthcare professionals' education, (6) adherence assessment, (7) facilitating access to medicine by service integration. For each intervention, experts assessed (a) target population, (b) health professionals potentially involved in the intervention, (c) strategies/instruments needed for implementation, and (d) time of the intervention. Interventions that target adherence must combine different approaches targeting the complex aspects of older adults in a holistic approach. Tackling non-adherence, with its complexity, requires a multi-stakeholder patient-centred approach acting in a defined framework of interactions in which the different players may provide different services but are integrated with one another.

Indexed as

AgingConsensusDrug MonitoringGeriatric AssessmentPatient-Centered CareAgedAged, 80 and overDrug TherapyEducation, ProfessionalHealth PersonnelHumansItalyMiddle AgedPatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.