ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016
Use of cardioselective β-blockers and overall death and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with COPD: a population-based cohort study.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of the Use of Beta-Blockers on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Associated with Cardiovascular Comorbities: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUse of β-blockers (BBs) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular diseases is supported by increasing evidence. However, most of these studies focused on the survival outcome and used a non-active comparison, prevalent-user design. We aimed to examine the risk of overall death and cardiovascular outcomes associated with use of cardioselective BBs using an active comparison, incident cohort approach.
methodsWe identified COPD patients initiating cardioselective BBs or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) between 2007 and 2011 in the population-based Taiwan database. A Cox regression model was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for overall death, cardiovascular death, and cardiovascular events comparing cardioselective BBs and non-dihydropyridine CCBs after propensity score matching. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to quantify the unmeasured confounding effect from COPD severity.
resultsA total of 107,902 patients were included. Cardioselective BBs were associated with a modest, lower risk of overall death (HR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.81-0.88). The reduced risk of overall death, however, was vulnerable to distribution of COPD severity and was easily weakened with lower prevalence of severe COPD patients in the initiators of cardioselective BBs and higher prevalence of severe COPD patients in the initiators of non-dihydropyridine CCBs. No excess benefit for cardiovascular death (HR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.97-1.13) or cardiovascular events (HR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.94-1.03) was detected.
conclusionThe present study demonstrated a potential effect of confounding by COPD severity and therefore did not suggest an association between use of cardioselective BB and survival benefit in COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.