Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27444173›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies-a systematic review.

Marianne Heibert Arnlind, Linda Fryklund, Sigurd Vitols, Göran Bertilsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marianne Heibert ArnlindDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linda FryklundSwedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, Box 3657, 103 59, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sigurd VitolsSwedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, Box 3657, 103 59, Stockholm, Sweden.
Göran BertilssonSwedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, Box 3657, 103 59, Stockholm, Sweden. goran.bertilsson@sbu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5660-7376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe systematically reviewed published observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) reports of clinical trials on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA's). Only studies evaluating the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies (ADA) of both original and biosimilar drugs were chosen.

methodsDatabases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to 17 March 2015. Two reviewers independently assessed the relevant studies for risk of bias.

resultsTwenty-one publications were included. The overall prevalence of ADA in the studies was about 0.2 to 0.5 %. Most studies were not designed to monitor the development of ADA and often the study duration was too short (less than 6 months) and the patient population too small. Moreover, in many studies, the assays used only determined the presence of ADA and did not measure therapy failure due to ADA. In one RCT, as many as 13 cases (4 %) of ADA were identified.

conclusionADA development seems to be low in short-term studies with ESA. None of the efficacy and safety issues for ESA biosimilars were judged to be adequately addressed in the evaluated literature, with respect to ADA formation, due to the study design and the assay method used.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsAnemiaAntibodiesHematinicsHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskAntibodiesBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHematinicsAntibodiesBiosimilarEfficacyErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.