Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27443319›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2017

Instability of visual error processing for sensorimotor adaptation in schizophrenia.

Rebekka Lencer, Annegret Meermeier, Karen Silling, Svenja Gremmler, Markus Lappe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Saccadic suppression in schizophrenia.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Disrupted Corollary Discharge in Schizophrenia: Evidence From the Oculomotor System.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebekka LencerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A9, 48149, Muenster, Germany. rebekka.lencer@ukmuenster.de.
Annegret MeermeierDepartment of Psychology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Karen SillingDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A9, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Svenja GremmlerDepartment of Psychology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Markus LappeDepartment of Psychology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
University of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic adaptation can be used to study disturbances of sensory processing and motor learning. We investigated whether patients with schizophrenia can adjust saccadic amplitudes to account for an increase in visual error while the saccade is in flight, and whether they transfer this change to a visuo-manual localization task. Fourteen patients (mean 37.1 years) and 14 healthy controls (mean 35.1 years) performed 200 adaptation trials of 10° with target shifts of 4° in the outward direction. We determined the percent amplitude change during adaptation and adaptation speed. In addition, subjects localized a stimulus that was flashed 50 ms after saccade target onset to measure the transfer of change in visual space perception to visuo-manual coordination. Eye movements were recorded at 1000 Hz. Saccade amplitudes increased over adaptation trials by 11 % (p < 0.001) similarly in both groups. Amplitude variability during adaptation was higher in patients (1.06° ± 0.32°) than in controls (0.71° ± 0.14°; p = 0.001), while adaptation speed was slower in patients (0.02 ± 0.03) than in controls (0.11 ± 0.11; p = 0.01). Other pre- and post-adaptation saccade metrics did not differ between groups. The adaptation process shifted localization of the flashed target in the adaptation direction similarly in both groups. The use of error signals for the internal recalibration of sensorimotor systems and the transfer of this recalibration to visual space perception appear basically unimpaired in schizophrenia. Higher amplitude variability in patients suggests a certain instability of saccadic control in cerebellar systems. Patients seem to rely on visual error processing in frontal circuitry, resulting in slower adaptation speeds, despite unimpaired adaptation strength.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAnalysis of VarianceFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrientationPerceptual DisordersPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSchizophreniaVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAmplitude variabilityEfference copyPrediction errorSaccadesVisual space perceptionVisuo-manual transfer

Identifiers

PMID27443319
OpenAlexW2499327647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.