ArticleBlood2016
DNA repair of myeloma plasma cells correlates with clinical outcome: the effect of the nonhomologous end-joining inhibitor SCR7.
Article in Blood, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retraction Note: Chromatin structure, transcriptional activity and DNA repair efficiency affect the outcome of chemotherapy in multiple myeloma.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Retraction Note: Defective DNA repair and chromatin organization in patients with quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- DNA Damage Response and Redox Status in the Resistance of Multiple Myeloma Cells to Genotoxic Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- DNA Damage Response Network and Intracellular Redox Status in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- The Interplay between the DNA Damage Response (DDR) Network and the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Signaling Pathway in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Indisulam synergizes with melphalan to inhibit Multiple Myeloma malignancy via targeting TOP2A.PloS one · 2024Article
- Selective inhibition of DNA ligase IV provides additional efficacy to the treatment of anaplastic thyroid cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- The Combination of Panobinostat and Melphalan for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Preclinical validation and phase I trial of 4-hydroxysalicylanilide, targeting ribonucleotide reductase mediated dNTP synthesis in multiple myeloma.Journal of biomedical science · 2022Article
- Article
- Antiviral Effect of Polyphenolic Substances inEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Targeting the Interplay between HDACs and DNA Damage Repair for Myeloma Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- SCR7, a potent cancer therapeutic agent and a biochemical inhibitor of nonhomologous DNA end-joining.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Review
- The DNA damage response network in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.ESMO open · 2021Article
- Review
- DNA double-strand breaks repair inhibitors potentiates the combined effect of VP-16 and CDDP in human colorectal adenocarcinoma (LoVo) cells.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- A novel BCMA PBD-ADC with ATM/ATR/WEE1 inhibitors or bortezomib induce synergistic lethality in multiple myeloma.Leukemia · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
DNA repair activity of malignant cells seems to influence therapeutic outcome and patients' survival. Herein, we investigated the mechanistic basis for the link between DNA repair efficiency and response to antimyeloma therapy. Nucleotide excision repair (NER), interstrand cross-links repair (ICL/R), double-strand breaks repair (DSB/R), and chromatin structure were evaluated in multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines (melphalan-sensitive RPMI8226; melphalan-resistant LR5) and bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) from MM patients who responded (n = 17) or did not respond (n = 9) to subsequent melphalan therapy. The effect of DSB/R inhibition was also evaluated. Responders' BMPCs showed slower rates of NER and DSB/R (P <0022), similar rates of ICL/R, and more condensed chromatin structure compared with nonresponders. Moreover, apoptosis rates of BMPCs were inversely correlated with individual DNA repair efficiency and were higher in responders' cells compared with those of nonresponders (P = .0011). Similarly, RPMI8226 cells showed slower rates of NER and DSB/R, comparable rates of ICL/R, more condensed chromatin structure, and higher sensitivity than LR5 cells. Interestingly, cotreatment of BMPCs or cell lines with DSB/R inhibitors significantly reduced the rates of DSB/R and increased melphalan sensitivity of the cells, with the nonhomologous end-joining inhibitor SCR7 showing the strongest effect. Together, responders' BMPCs are characterized by lower efficiencies of NER and DSB/R mechanisms, resulting in higher accumulation of the extremely cytotoxic ICLs and DSBs lesions, which in turn triggers the induction of the apoptotic pathway. Moreover, the enhancement of melphalan cytotoxicity by DSB/R inhibition offers a promising strategy toward improvement of existing antimyeloma regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.