Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27443270›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2016

Annual cost of antiretroviral therapy among three service delivery models in Uganda.

Lung Vu, Samuel Waliggo, Brady Zieman, Nrupa Jani, Lydia Buzaalirwa, Stephen Okoboi, Jerry Okal, Nagesh N Borse, Samuel Kalibala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality matters: Redefining child TB care with an emphasis on quality.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evidence for scale up: the differentiated care research agenda.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lung VuPopulation Council, Washington, DC, USA; lung.vu@gmail.com.
Samuel WaliggoKitovu Mobile AIDS Organisation, Masaka, Uganda.
Brady ZiemanPopulation Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Nrupa JaniPopulation Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Lydia BuzaalirwaUganda Cares, Kampala, Uganda.
Stephen OkoboiThe AIDS Support Organisation, Kampala, Uganda.
Jerry OkalPopulation Council, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nagesh N BorseUS Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Samuel KalibalaPopulation Council, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn response to the increasing burden of HIV, the Ugandan government has employed different service delivery models since 2004 that aim to reduce costs and remove barriers to accessing HIV care. These models include community-based approaches to delivering antiretroviral therapy (ART) and delegating tasks to lower-level health workers. This study aimed to provide data on annual ART cost per client among three different service delivery models in Uganda.

methodsCosting data for the entire year 2012 were retrospectively collected as part of a larger task-shifting study conducted in three organizations in Uganda: Kitovu Mobile (KM), the AIDS Support Organisation (TASO) and Uganda Cares (UC). A standard cost data capture tool was developed and used to retrospectively collect cost information regarding antiretroviral (ARV) drugs and non-ARV drugs, ART-related lab tests, personnel and administrative costs. A random sample of four TASO centres (out of 11), four UC clinics (out of 29) and all KM outreach units were selected for the study.

resultsCost varied across sites within each organization as well as across the three organizations. In addition, the number of annual ART visits was more frequent in rural areas and through KM (the community distribution model), which played a major part in the overall annual ART cost. The annual cost per client (in USD) was $404 for KM, $332 for TASO and $257 for UC. These estimates were lower than previous analyses in Uganda or the region compared to data from 2001 to 2009, but comparable with recent estimates using data from 2010 to 2013. ARVs accounted for the majority of the total cost, followed by personnel and operational costs.

conclusionsThe study provides updated data on annual cost per ART visit for three service delivery models in Uganda. These data will be vital for in-country budgetary efforts to ensure that universal access to ART, as called for in the 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, is achievable. The lower annual ART cost found in this study indicates that we may be able to treat all people with HIV as laid out in the 2015 WHO guidelines. The variation of costs across sites and the three models indicates the potential for efficiency gains.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansModels, EconomicUgandaWorld Health OrganizationAnti-HIV AgentsARTcommunity-based ARTcostefficiencytask-shiftingUganda

Identifiers

PMID27443270
PMCPMC4956730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.