Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27442691›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2016

Contingency management is effective in promoting abstinence and retention in treatment among crack cocaine users in Brazil: A randomized controlled trial.

André Q C Miguel, Clarice S Madruga, Hugo Cogo-Moreira, Rodolfo Yamauchi, Viviane Simões, Claudio J da Silva, Sterling McPherson, John M Roll, Ronaldo R Laranjeira

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01815645 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating the Efficacy of Including Contingency Management to Standard Ambulatory Treatment for Crack Addiction - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of São PauloRan2012 to 2015Enrolled65ConditionsCocaine Related DisordersArmsST+CM, standard treatment
NCT05097547 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Contingency Management for Stimulant Use Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsStimulant Use, Contingency ManagementArmsContingency Management
NCT07121296 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Screen, Treat and Retain People With Primary Meth Use Disorder at MMT Clinics

TypeinterventionalSponsorHanoi Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsMethamphetamine Use DisorderArmsContingency management for substance use, Contingency management for attendance, Group-based Matrix counseling, Individual-based Matrix counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Financial Incentives for Substance Abstinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Quality-of-life improvements associated with reductions in cocaine-positive urine drug screens.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

André Q C MiguelNational Institute of Policies on Alcohol and Drugs (INPAD), Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).
Clarice S MadrugaNational Institute of Policies on Alcohol and Drugs (INPAD), Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).
Hugo Cogo-MoreiraDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).
Rodolfo YamauchiNational Institute of Policies on Alcohol and Drugs (INPAD), Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).
Viviane SimõesNational Institute of Policies on Alcohol and Drugs (INPAD), Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).
Claudio J da SilvaNational Institute of Policies on Alcohol and Drugs (INPAD), Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).
Sterling McPhersonProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University.
John M RollProgram of Excellence in Addictions Research, Washington State University.
Ronaldo R LaranjeiraNational Institute of Policies on Alcohol and Drugs (INPAD), Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP).
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRInstitute for Research, Education and Training in Addictions · US

Funding

CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK: PACIFIC NORTHWEST NODEU10DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DONOVAN, DENNIS MICHAEL, ROLL, JOHN M. · 2001 to 2015
$25.5M
Clinical Trials Network: Pacific Northwest Node (CTN-0082, -0131, -0139 and dissemination library)UG1DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mary Akiko Hatch, John M. Roll · 2015 to 2026
$19.8M
NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013714NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crack cocaine dependence has become a severe public health problem in Brazil, and current psychosocial approaches to this problem have shown little or no effectiveness. Although contingency management is among the most effective behavioral treatments for substance use disorders, it has never been applied in the treatment of crack cocaine-dependent individuals in Brazil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of incorporating contingency management into standard outpatient treatment for crack cocaine dependence, as well as the impact that doing so has on treatment attendance, retention in treatment, maintenance of abstinence, and the frequency of substance use. We evaluated 65 treatment-seeking, crack cocaine-dependent individuals, randomized to receive 12 weeks of standard treatment plus contingency management (STCM; n = 33) or 12 weeks of standard treatment alone (STA; n = 32). Those in the STCM group received monetary incentives for being abstinent, earning up to US$235.50 if they remained abstinent throughout the entire treatment period. The STCM group participants attended a mean of 19.5 (SD = 14.9) treatment sessions, compared with 3.7 (SD = 5.9) for the STA group participants (p < .01). Those in the STCM group were 3.8, 4.6, and 68.9 times more likely to be retained in treatment at weeks 4, 8, and 12 than were those in the STA group. The likelihood of detecting 4, 8, and 12 weeks of continuous abstinence was 17.7, 9.9, and 18.6 times higher in the STCM group than in the STA group (p < .05). Compared to the STA group, the STCM group submitted a significantly higher proportion of negative samples for crack cocaine, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and alcohol (p < .001) when all expected samples were included in the denominator but not when only submitted samples were considered. The average monthly cost/participant for incentives was $29.00. Contingency management showed efficacy in a sample of Brazilian crack cocaine users. The intervention holds promise for broader application in international settings. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Crack CocaineMotivationAdultAmbulatory CareBehavior TherapyBrazilCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeCrack Cocaine

Identifiers

PMID27442691
PMCPMC5102809
OpenAlexW2488102361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.