Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27442661›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2016

Impact of sex disparities on the clinical manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kamini Devi Boodhoo, Sijia Liu, Xiaoxia Zuo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Role of B Cell and T Cell Glycosylation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamini Devi BoodhooDepartment of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Sijia Liu
Xiaoxia Zuo
Xiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune multiorgan disorder of unknown etiology. It affects both men and women, but with different disease manifestations of differing disease severity and in varying proportion, with a female predominance of approximately 90%. There have been numerous studies addressing this issue, especially its implications in relation to optimal sex-tailored treatment and improvement of survival rate; however, further research is warranted. A meta-analysis of studies was performed to compare the impact of sex on the clinical outcomes of SLE in different populations.

methodsA literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases (until January 2016) was conducted to identify relevant articles. Clinical manifestations reported in these patients were considered as endpoints for this meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers determined eligibility criteria. A fixed-effect model has been used where a small heterogeneity was observed, or else, a random-effect model has been used among the studies. Odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to express the pooled effect on dichotomous variables, and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3.

resultsSixteen studies consisting of a total of 11,934 SLE patients (10,331 females and 1603 males) have been included in this meta-analysis. The average female-to-male ratio of all the included studies is around 9.3:1. Several statistically significant differences were found: alopecia, photosensitivity, and oral ulcers were significantly higher in female patients (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.29-0.46, P < 0.00001; OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.83, P < 0.00001; and OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.82, P < 0.00001, respectively). Malar rash was significantly higher in female patients (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.003), and arthritis was significantly lower in male patients (OR 0.72, 95% CI 1.25-1.84, P < 0.00001). However, serositis and pleurisies were significantly higher in female patients (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.25-1.84 P < 0.0001; and OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.48, P = 0.006, respectively). Renal involvement was higher in male patients (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31-1.75, P < 0.00001).

conclusionThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that alopecia, photosensitivity, oral ulcers, arthritis, malar rash, lupus anticoagulant level, and low level of C3 were significantly higher in female lupus patients, whereas renal involvement, serositis and pleurisies, thrombocytopenia, and anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid level were predominant in male patients.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMalePrecision MedicineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27442661
PMCPMC5265778
OpenAlexW2503365260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.