SynthesisMedicine2016
Impact of sex disparities on the clinical manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atopic dermatitis and risk of autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Sex hormones affect the pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- The Importance of Sex Stratification in Autoimmune Disease Biomarker Research: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Pooled it
- Real-world validation of the SLERPI diagnostic model with concordance and discordance analysis across established SLE classification criteria.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- Sex differences in primary Sjögren's disease: prognostic impact on mortality and cancer.Biology of sex differences · 2026Observational
- Gender differences in the clinical features and quality of life of Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study based on the LUNA registry.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- A study of clinical manifestations and associated factors in photosensitive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Understanding Sex Differences in Autoimmune Diseases: Immunologic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Systemic lupus erythematosus: An imitator for inflammatory bowel disease.JPGN reports · 2024Article
- Sex bias in immune response: it is time to include the sex variable in studies of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Worse cardiovascular and renal outcome in male SLE patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Dysregulated endothelial cell markers in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2023Review
- Sex differences in the percentage of IRF5 positive B cells are associated with higher production of TNF-α in women in response to TLR9 in humans.Biology of sex differences · 2023Article
- The Role of B Cell and T Cell Glycosylation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Case report of systemic lupus erythematosus in a middle-aged male with facial palsy at onset.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2022Article
- The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases: could sex make the difference?Biology of sex differences · 2021Review
- Association of Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure With Dermatomyositis in a National Myositis Patient Registry.Arthritis care & research · 2020Article
- Use of Quality Measures to Identify Disparities in Health Care for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2020Review
- Anti-Sm Antibody, Damage Index, and Corticosteroid Use Are Associated with Cardiac Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from a Prospective Registry Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune multiorgan disorder of unknown etiology. It affects both men and women, but with different disease manifestations of differing disease severity and in varying proportion, with a female predominance of approximately 90%. There have been numerous studies addressing this issue, especially its implications in relation to optimal sex-tailored treatment and improvement of survival rate; however, further research is warranted. A meta-analysis of studies was performed to compare the impact of sex on the clinical outcomes of SLE in different populations.
methodsA literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases (until January 2016) was conducted to identify relevant articles. Clinical manifestations reported in these patients were considered as endpoints for this meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers determined eligibility criteria. A fixed-effect model has been used where a small heterogeneity was observed, or else, a random-effect model has been used among the studies. Odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to express the pooled effect on dichotomous variables, and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3.
resultsSixteen studies consisting of a total of 11,934 SLE patients (10,331 females and 1603 males) have been included in this meta-analysis. The average female-to-male ratio of all the included studies is around 9.3:1. Several statistically significant differences were found: alopecia, photosensitivity, and oral ulcers were significantly higher in female patients (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.29-0.46, P < 0.00001; OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.83, P < 0.00001; and OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.82, P < 0.00001, respectively). Malar rash was significantly higher in female patients (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, P = 0.003), and arthritis was significantly lower in male patients (OR 0.72, 95% CI 1.25-1.84, P < 0.00001). However, serositis and pleurisies were significantly higher in female patients (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.25-1.84 P < 0.0001; and OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.48, P = 0.006, respectively). Renal involvement was higher in male patients (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31-1.75, P < 0.00001).
conclusionThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that alopecia, photosensitivity, oral ulcers, arthritis, malar rash, lupus anticoagulant level, and low level of C3 were significantly higher in female lupus patients, whereas renal involvement, serositis and pleurisies, thrombocytopenia, and anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid level were predominant in male patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.