ArticlePloS one2016
Single-Shot Smartphone-Based Quantitative Phase Imaging Using a Distorted Grating.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and Study of a Reflector-Separated Light Dispersion-Compensated 3D Microscopy System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Microscopic Imaging Methods for Organ-on-a-Chip Platforms.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Detection of Bacterial and Viral Pathogens Using Photonic Point-of-Care Devices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Simple adaptive mobile phone screen illumination for dual phone differential phase contrast (DPDPC) microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Measurements on ATP induced cellular fluctuations using real-time dual view transport of intensity phase microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Smartphone-based clinical diagnostics: towards democratization of evidence-based health care.Journal of internal medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood testing has been used as an essential tool to diagnose diseases for decades. Recently, there has been a rapid developing trend in using Quantitative Phase Imaging (QPI) methods for blood cell screening. Compared to traditional blood testing techniques, QPI has the advantage of avoiding dyeing or staining the specimen, which may cause damage to the cells. However, most existing systems are bulky and costly, requiring experienced personnel to operate. This work demonstrates the integration of one QPI method onto a smartphone platform and the application of imaging red blood cells. The adopted QPI method is based on solving the Intensity Transport Equation (ITE) from two de-focused pupil images taken in one shot by the smartphone camera. The device demonstrates a system resolution of about 1 μm, and is ready to be used for 3D morphological study of red blood cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.