Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27441232›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2015

Hydrogen peroxide induced cell death: One or two modes of action?

Lionel Uhl, Audrey Gerstel, Maialène Chabalier, Sam Dukan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding Iron and Oxidative Stress Response inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. No Chance to Survive:Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lionel UhlInstitut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée - Université Aix-Marseille, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne, CNRS UMR7283, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13009 Marseille, France.
Audrey GerstelInstitut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée - Université Aix-Marseille, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne, CNRS UMR7283, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13009 Marseille, France.
Maialène ChabalierInstitut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée - Université Aix-Marseille, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne, CNRS UMR7283, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13009 Marseille, France.
Sam DukanInstitut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée - Université Aix-Marseille, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne, CNRS UMR7283, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13009 Marseille, France.
Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imlay and Linn show that exposure of logarithmically growing Escherichia coli to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) leads to two kinetically distinguishable modes of cell killing. Mode one killing is pronounced near 1 mM concentration of H2O2 and is caused by DNA damage, whereas mode-two killing requires higher concentration ([Formula: see text]). The second mode seems to be essentially due to damage to all macromolecules. This phenomenon has also been observed in Fenton in vitro systems with DNA nicking caused by hydroxyl radical ([Formula: see text]). To our knowledge, there is currently no mathematical model for predicting mode one killing in vitro or in vivo after H2O2 exposure. We propose a simple model, using Escherichia coli as a model organism and a set of ordinary differential equations. Using this model, we show that available iron and cell density, two factors potentially involved in ROS dynamics, play a major role in the prediction of the experimental results obtained by our team and in previous studies. Indeed the presence of the mode one killing is strongly related to those two parameters. To our knowledge, mode-one death has not previously been explained. Imlay and Linn (Imlay and Linn, 1986) suggested that perhaps the amount of the toxic species was reduced at high concentrations of H2O2 because hydroxyl (or other) radicals might be quenched directly by hydrogen peroxide with the concomitant formation of superoxide anion (a less toxic species). We demonstrate (mathematically and numerically) that free available iron decrease is necessary to explain mode one killing which cannot appear without it and that H2O2 quenching or consumption is not responsible for mode-one death. We are able to follow ROS concentration (particularly responsible for mode one killing) after exposure to H2O2. This model therefore allows us to understand two major parameters involved in the presence or not of the first killing mode.

Indexed as

Mathematical biosciencesMathematical modellingSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID27441232
PMCPMC4945851
OpenAlexW2218476428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.