ArticlePlastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)2016
The use of the radial styloid in the extended osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap.
Article in Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OC-RFFF) remains a useful tool in head and neck reconstruction; however, it can be challenging to harvest sufficient bone for large reconstructions. The extended OC-RFFF is a modification that involves harvest of the distal border of the radius to the tip of the styloid. This increases the length of the bone flap by 2 cm to 3 cm, and the inherent contour of the styloid can be used to reconstruct the anterior curvature of the mandible or maxilla without additional osteotomies that may reduce blood supply.
methodsThe key steps in harvesting the extended OC-RFFF are described. Six patients with mandibular or maxillary defects underwent reconstruction with the extended OC-RFFF. Patient data including demographics, defect features, reconstruction details and outcomes were collected.
resultsOf the six patients who underwent the extended OC-RFFF, four had mandibular reconstruction and two had maxillary reconstruction. Two patients underwent reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis and the remainder for malignant disease. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 64.5 years. The length of radius harvested ranged from 8 cm to 14 cm (mean 9.7 cm). Two of six patients required a single osteotomy of their bone flap. Donor site complications included partial skin graft loss in 50% and a radius fracture in two patients. Recipient site complications included one patient with intraoral plate exposure. There have been no cases of nonunion.
conclusionsThe extended OC-RFFF was a safe and reliable option for bony reconstruction in the head and neck.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.