Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27441087›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2016

Plant adaptation to drought stress.

Supratim Basu, Venkategowda Ramegowda, Anuj Kumar, Andy Pereira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Photosynthetic Performance of Green Alder (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chickpea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supratim BasuCrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA.
Venkategowda RamegowdaCrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA.
Anuj KumarCrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA.
Andy PereiraCrop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants in their natural habitats adapt to drought stress in the environment through a variety of mechanisms, ranging from transient responses to low soil moisture to major survival mechanisms of escape by early flowering in absence of seasonal rainfall. However, crop plants selected by humans to yield products such as grain, vegetable, or fruit in favorable environments with high inputs of water and fertilizer are expected to yield an economic product in response to inputs. Crop plants selected for their economic yield need to survive drought stress through mechanisms that maintain crop yield. Studies on model plants for their survival under stress do not, therefore, always translate to yield of crop plants under stress, and different aspects of drought stress response need to be emphasized. The crop plant model rice ( Oryza sativa) is used here as an example to highlight mechanisms and genes for adaptation of crop plants to drought stress.

Indexed as

Adaptationdrought resistanceDrought tolerancegrain yieldphotosynthesisrice

Identifiers

PMID27441087
PMCPMC4937719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.