Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27441084›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2016

Improving quality for maternal care - a case study from Kerala, India.

Ioana Vlad, V P Paily, Rajeev Sadanandan, Françoise Cluzeau, M Beena, Rajasekharan Nair, Emma Newbatt, Sujit Ghosh, K Sandeep, Kalipso Chalkidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Attributes of Standard Treatment Guidelines in Clinical Settings and Public Health Facilities in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ioana VladLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
V P PailyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajagiri Hospital, Kerala, India.
Rajeev SadanandanCentral Secretariat, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Françoise CluzeauNICE International, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
M BeenaGovernment of Kerala, Kerala, India.
Rajasekharan NairDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.U.T. Hospital, Kerala, India.
Emma NewbattITAD , Hove, UK.
Sujit GhoshITAD , Hove, UK.
K SandeepMonitoring and Evaluation, National Health Mission, Kerala, India.
Kalipso ChalkidouNICE International, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of maternal health guidelines remains unsatisfactory, even for simple, well established interventions. In settings where most births occur in health facilities, as is the case in Kerala, India, preventing maternal mortality is linked to quality of care improvements. CONTEXT: Evidence-informed quality standards (QS), including quality statements and measurable structure and process indicators, are one innovative way of tackling the guideline implementation gap. Having adopted a zero tolerance policy to maternal deaths, the Government of Kerala worked in partnership with the Kerala Federation of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (KFOG) and NICE International to select the clinical topic, develop and initiate implementation of the first clinical QS for reducing maternal mortality in the state. Description of practice: The NICE QS development framework was adapted to the Kerala context, with local ownership being a key principle. Locally generated evidence identified post-partum haemorrhage as the leading cause of maternal death, and as the key priority for the QS. A multidisciplinary group (including policy-makers, gynaecologists and obstetricians, nurses and administrators) was established. Multi-stakeholder workshops convened by the group ensured that the statements, derived from global and local guidelines, and their corresponding indicators were relevant and acceptable to clinicians and policy-makers in Kerala. Furthermore, it helped identify practical methods for implementing the standards and monitoring outcomes. LESSONS LEARNED: An independent evaluation of the project highlighted the equal importance of a strong evidence-base and an inclusive development process. There is no one-size-fits-all process for QS development; a principle-based approach might be a better guide for countries to adapt global evidence to their local context.

Indexed as

evidence-informed policy-makingmaternal healthquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID27441084
PMCPMC4926753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.