ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2017
Medical Parasitology Taxonomy Update: January 2012 to December 2015.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An Update on the Novel Genera and Species and Revised Taxonomic Status of Bacterial Organisms Described in 2016 and 2017.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Pooled it
- Medical Parasitology Taxonomy Update, 2016-2017.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Pooled it
- Antimicrobial Potential of Scorpion-Venom-Derived Peptides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Valid and accepted novel bacterial taxa derived from human clinical specimens and taxonomic revisions published in 2022.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- The Gut-Wrenching Effects of Cryptosporidiosis and Giardiasis in Children.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Medical Parasitology Taxonomy Update, January 2018 to May 2020.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Review
- Epidemiology of Giardia duodenalis assemblages in Brazil: there is still a long way to go.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2021Review
- An annotated checklist of the eukaryotic parasites of humans, exclusive of fungi and algae.ZooKeys · 2021Article
- Scorpion Venom: Detriments and Benefits.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- A Rose by Any Other Name: Practical Updates on Microbial Nomenclature for Clinical Microbiology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parasites of medical importance have long been classified taxonomically by morphological characteristics. However, molecular-based techniques have been increasingly used and relied on to determine evolutionary distances for the basis of rational hierarchal classifications. This has resulted in several different classification schemes for parasites and changes in parasite taxonomy. The purpose of this Minireview is to provide a single reference for diagnostic laboratories that summarizes new and revised clinically relevant parasite taxonomy from January 2012 through December 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.