ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016
First Evaluation of GenoType MTBDRplus 2.0 Performed Directly on Respiratory Specimens in Central America.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mutations associated with resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid identified in strains of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- An isothermal amplification-based point-of-care diagnostic platform for the detection ofCurrent research in biotechnology · 2021Article
- Current state of the art in rapid diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance.Lab on a chip · 2020Review
- Feasibility of Direct Sputum Molecular Testing for Drug Resistance as Part of Tuberculosis Clinical Trials Eligibility Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The turnaround times for conventional methods used to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples and to obtain drug susceptibility information are long in many developing countries, including Panama, leading to delays in appropriate treatment initiation and continued transmission in the community. We evaluated the performance of a molecular line probe assay, the Genotype MTBDRplus version 2.0 assay, in detecting M. tuberculosis complex directly in respiratory specimens from smear-positive tuberculosis cases from four different regions in Panama, as well as the most frequent mutations in genes conferring resistance to isoniazid (katG and inhA) and rifampin (rpoB). Our results were confirmed with the nitrate reductase assay and genomic sequencing. M. tuberculosis complex was detected by the Genotype MTBDRplus 2.0 assay with 100% sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity and specificity for rifampin resistance were 100% and 100%, respectively, and those for isoniazid resistance were 90.7% and 100%. Isoniazid monoresistance was detected in 5.2% of new cases. Genotype MTBDRplus 2.0 is highly accurate in detecting M. tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens and is able to discriminate isoniazid-monoresistant cases from multidrug-resistant cases within 2 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.