ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016
What about microsaccades in the electroencephalogram of infants?
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early neurophysiological markers of aberrant auditory processing associated with increased risk of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review.Pediatric investigation · 2025Review
- Integrating music-based interventions with Gamma-frequency stimulation: Implications for healthy ageing.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Review
- Rhythms of human attention and memory: An embedded process perspective.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
- Toward the Understanding of Topographical and Spectral Signatures of Infant Movement Artifacts in Naturalistic EEG.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Neuronal oscillations reveal the processes underlying intentional compared to incidental learning in children and young adults.PloS one · 2017Article
- On potential ocular artefacts in infant electroencephalogram: a reply to comments by Köster.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.