ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016
Effect of Different Rotational Directions of BJUT-II VAD on Aortic Swirling Flow Characteristics: A Primary Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Correlation between geometric parameters of the left coronary artery and hemodynamic descriptors of atherosclerosis: FSI and statistical study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2019Article
- Helical Flow Component of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) Outflow Improves Aortic Hemodynamic States.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Total Artificial Heart Implantation After Undifferentiated High-Grade Sarcoma Excision.Medical science monitor basic research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The BJUT-II VAD is a novel left ventricular assist device (LVAD), which is thought to have significant effects on the characteristics of aortic swirling flow. However, the precise mechanism of the rotational direction of BJTU-II VAD in the aortic swirling flow is unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS A patient-specific aortic geometric model was reconstructed based on the CT data. Three pump's output flow profiles with varied rotational direction, termed "counterclockwise", "flat profile", and "clockwise", were used as the boundary conditions. The helicity density, area-weighted average of helicity density (Ha), localized normalized helicity (LNH), wall shear stress (WSS), and WSS spatial gradient (WSSG) were calculated to evaluate the swirling flow characteristics in the aorta. RESULTS The results demonstrated that the swirling flow characteristics in the aorta and 3 branches are directly affected by the output blood flow of BJUT-II VAD. In the aortic arch, the helicity density, supported by the clockwise case, achieved the highest value. In the 3 branches, the flat profile case achieved the highest helicity density, whereas the maximum WSS and WSSG generated by clockwise case were lower than in other cases. CONCLUSIONS The outflow of the BJUT-II VAD has significant effects on the aortic hemodynamics and swirling flow characteristics. The helical blood profiles can enhance the strength of aortic swirling flow, and reduce the areas of low WSS and WSSG regions. The clockwise case may have a benefit for preventing development of atherosclerosis in the aorta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.