Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27440244›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Vestibular nucleus neurons respond to hindlimb movement in the conscious cat.

Andrew A McCall, Derek M Miller, William M DeMayo, George H Bourdages, Bill J Yates

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Responses of neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of conscious cats to anticipated and passive movements.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predictive Sensing: The Role of Motor Signals in Sensory Processing.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew A McCallDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and mccallaa@upmc.edu.
Derek M MillerDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
William M DeMayoDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
George H BourdagesDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Bill J YatesDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6819-097X
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Training in Auditory and Vestibular NeuroscienceT32DC011499 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Karl Kandler, BILL J YATES · 2011 to 2026
$3.0M
Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC000066 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHNSON, JONAS T. · 2003 to 2017
$1.8M
Effects of Hindlimb Inputs on the Activity of Vestibular Nucleus NeuronsK08DC013571 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MCCALL, ANDREW · 2015 to 2019
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC013571NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000066NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC011499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limbs constitute the sole interface with the ground during most waking activities in mammalian species; it is therefore expected that somatosensory inputs from the limbs provide important information to the central nervous system for balance control. In the decerebrate cat model, the activity of a subset of neurons in the vestibular nuclei (VN) has been previously shown to be modulated by hindlimb movement. However, decerebration can profoundly alter the effects of sensory inputs on the activity of brain stem neurons, resulting in epiphenomenal responses. Thus, before this study, it was unclear whether and how somatosensory inputs from the limb affected the activity of VN neurons in conscious animals. We recorded brain stem neuronal activity in the conscious cat and characterized the responses of VN neurons to flexion and extension hindlimb movements and to whole body vertical tilts (vestibular stimulation). Among 96 VN neurons whose activity was modulated by vestibular stimulation, the firing rate of 65 neurons (67.7%) was also affected by passive hindlimb movement. VN neurons in conscious cats most commonly encoded hindlimb movement irrespective of the direction of movement (n = 33, 50.8%), in that they responded to all flexion and extension movements of the limb. Other VN neurons overtly encoded information about the direction of hindlimb movement (n = 27, 41.5%), and the remainder had more complex responses. These data confirm that hindlimb somatosensory and vestibular inputs converge onto VN neurons of the conscious cat, suggesting that VN neurons integrate somatosensory inputs from the limbs in computations that affect motor outflow to maintain balance.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCatsConsciousnessElectrodes, ImplantedHindlimbMotor ActivityMovementMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNeuronsPhysical StimulationProprioceptionVestibular NucleiVolitionbalancehindlimbmultisensory integrationproprioception

Identifiers

PMID27440244
PMCPMC5144685
OpenAlexW2506761091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.