Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439991›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2016

[The German research network for mental disorders].

M Bauer, T Banaschewski, A Heinz, I Kamp-Becker, A Meyer-Lindenberg, F Padberg, M A Rapp, R Rupprecht, F Schneider, T G Schulze and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M BauerKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. michael.bauer@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
T BanaschewskiZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
A HeinzKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland.
I Kamp-BeckerKlinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
A Meyer-LindenbergZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
F PadbergKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität München, München, Deutschland.
M A RappSozial- und Präventivmedizin, Exzellenzbereich Kognitionswissenschaften, Department Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, Deutschland.
R RupprechtKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
F SchneiderKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
T G SchulzeInstitut für Psychiatrische Phänomik und Genomik (IPPG), Klinikum der Universität München, München, Deutschland.
H-U WittchenInstitut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental disorders are among the greatest medical and social challenges facing us. They can occur at all stages of life and are among the most important commonly occurring diseases. In Germany 28 % of the population suffer from a mental disorder every year, while the lifetime risk of suffering from a mental disorder is almost 50 %. Mental disorders cause great suffering for those affected and their social network. Quantitatively speaking, they can be considered to be among those diseases creating the greatest burden for society due to reduced productivity, absence from work and premature retirement. The Federal Ministry of Education and Research is funding a new research network from 2015 to 2019 with up to 35 million euros to investigate mental disorders in order to devise and develop better therapeutic measures and strategies for this population by means of basic and translational clinical research. This is the result of a competitive call for research proposals entitled research network for mental diseases. It is a nationwide network of nine consortia with up to ten psychiatric and clinical psychology partner institutions from largely university-based research facilities for adults and/or children and adolescents. Furthermore, three cross-consortia platform projects will seek to identify shared causes of diseases and new diagnostic modalities for anxiety disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHS), autism, bipolar disorders, depression, schizophrenia and psychotic disorders as well as substance-related and addictive disorders. The spectrum of therapeutic approaches to be examined ranges from innovative pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment to novel brain stimulation procedures. In light of the enormous burden such diseases represent for society as a whole, a sustainable improvement in the financial support for those researching mental disorders seems essential. This network aims to become a nucleus for long overdue and sustained support for a German center for mental disorders.

Indexed as

Interinstitutional RelationsAcademic Medical CentersBiomedical ResearchGermanyGovernment ProgramsHumansMental DisordersModels, OrganizationalTranslational Research, BiomedicalHealth research centerMental disordersPreventionResearch fundingResearch network

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.