Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439887›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2017

Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 Flow Modulation Device: a multicenter experience.

Francesco Briganti, Giuseppe Leone, Lorenzo Ugga, Mariano Marseglia, Antonio Macera, Andrea Manto, Luigi Delehaye, Maurizio Resta, Mariachiara Resta, Nicola Burdi and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06201598 (Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Cerebral Aneurysms Using P64 and P48 Flow-Diverter Stents), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06201598 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Cerebral Aneurysms Using P64 and P48 Flow-Diverter Stents

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Universitario Central de AsturiasRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsCerebral Aneurysm, Thromboembolic DiseaseArmsGroup 1 - Intervention 1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Safety and efficacy of the surpass streamline for intracranial aneurysms (SESSIA): A multi-center US experience pooled analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. p64 flow diverter: Results in 108 patients from a single center.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Basic embolization techniques: tips and tricks.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco BrigantiUnit of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe LeoneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Lorenzo UggaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Mariano MarsegliaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Antonio MaceraDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Andrea MantoDepartment of Neuroradiology, 'Umberto I' Hospital, Nocera Inferiore, Salerno, Italy.
Luigi DelehayeUnit of Interventional Neuroradiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Maurizio RestaDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, 'SS Annunziata' Hospital, Taranto, Italy.
Mariachiara RestaUnit of Neuroradiology, Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy.
Nicola BurdiDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, 'SS Annunziata' Hospital, Taranto, Italy.
Nunzio Paolo NuzziUnit of Neuroradiology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Ignazio DivenutoDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
Ferdinando CaranciDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Mario MutoNeuroradiology Department, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Domenico SolariDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Paolo CappabiancaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Francesco MaiuriDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, 'Federico II' University, Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITOspedale SS. Annunziata · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITOspedale San Giovanni Bosco · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperience with the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using the p64 Flow Modulation Device is still limited. This study discusses the results and complications of this new flow diverter device.

methods40 patients (30 women, 10 men) with 50 cerebral aneurysms treated in six Italian neurointerventional centers with the p64 Flow Modulation Device between April 2013 and September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.

resultsComplete occlusion was obtained in 44/50 aneurysms (88%) and partial occlusion in 3 (6%). In the other three aneurysms (6%), two cases of asymptomatic in-stent thrombosis and one intraprocedural occlusion of the parent vessel occurred. Technical complications were observed in eight procedures (16%). Permanent morbidity due to acute in-stent thrombosis and consequent ischemic stroke occurred in one patient (2.5%). No delayed aneurysm rupture, subarachnoid or intraparenchymal hemorrhage, or ischemic complications occurred and there were no deaths.

conclusionsEndovascular treatment with the p64 Flow Modulation Device is a safe treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms, resulting in a high rate of occlusion. As with other flow diverter devices, we recommend this treatment mainly for large-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery siphon. However, endovascular treatment with the p64 device should also be encouraged in difficult cases such as aneurysms of the posterior circulation and beyond the circle of Willis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarotid Artery, InternalCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStentsStrokeTime FactorsAneurysmAngiographyFlow Diverter

Identifiers

PMID27439887
PMCPMC5264236
OpenAlexW2491026960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.