Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439760›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2016

An analytic observational study on complaints management in the general practice out of hours care setting: who complains, why, and what can we do about it?

Ruth A Barragry, Leo E Varadkar, David K Hanlon, Ken F Bailey, Tom C O'Dowd, Brendan J O'Shea

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Characterising patient complaints in out-of-hours general practice: a retrospective cohort study in Ireland.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruth A BarragryTCD HSE GP Training Scheme, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Leo E VaradkarTCD HSE GP Training Scheme, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.
David K HanlonKildare and West Wicklow Doctors on Call, Naas, Co Kildare, Ireland.
Ken F BaileyKildare and West Wicklow Doctors on Call, Naas, Co Kildare, Ireland.
Tom C O'DowdTCD Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Brendan J O'SheaTCD HSE GP Training Scheme, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland. drbrendanoshea@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral Practice Co-Operatives provide most out of hours care in communities in Ireland. Limited data exists on patient complaints. This study reports on complaints at Kildare and West Wicklow Doctors on Call ('K Doc'), a GP Co-Operative in Ireland, examining the impact of a formal risk reduction strategy implemented (2010-2013). The aim of the study was to determine if it was possible to reduce the rate of written complaints per 1000 consultations through a formal approach encompassing evaluation of complaints, improved communication in relation to complaints, and more direct use of insights gained from complaints analysis in continuing professional development at the Co-Operative.

methodsInitially, complaints submitted over an 18 month period (01.06.08 to 31.12.09) were analysed. Complaint rate (number of complaints per 1000 consultations), complainant demographics, aspects of complaint response at the Co-Operative, and nature of complaint were recorded. Based on analysis, a risk reduction strategy was undertaken, including procedural change, focused training and education. Areas selected for improvement during a second phase of data collection included complaints rate, timeliness of Co-Operative response to complaint, and rate of complaint notification to patient's GP. Further analysis was then carried out over a 45 month period (01.01.10 to 30.09.13).

resultsFrom 2008-2013, 216,716 patient consultations occurred. Complaints were received from 131 individuals, regarding 125 patients. Following introduction of risk reduction strategy, complaints rate reduced by 36 %, from 0.77 to 0.49 per 1000 consultations (p = 0.02) between the two periods of data collection. Timeliness of response from Co-Operative to the complainant improved from 63 % to 75 %. Notification of complaint to the patient's GP improved from 48 % to 96 %. Most complaints were not associated with medically significant events. The largest categories of complaint related to clinical care (55 % n = 69), cost (46 %, n = 58), communication (42 %, n = 53), and process of care (15 %, n = 19). Mothers of affluent paediatric patients were most likely to make formal complaints.

conclusionsThis study reports a statistically significant reduction in complaints rate of 36 % following introduction of risk reduction strategies at a GP Co -Operative. Out of hours consulting is known to be an area of high medical risk. Findings are of interest where number and costs of complaints against GPs are elsewhere reported to be rising, contributing to medical inflation, and to public concern.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAdolescentAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedChildChild, PreschoolCommunicationEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIrelandMaleComplaintsGP Co-operativeInterventionOut of hours consultingRisk reduction

Identifiers

PMID27439760
PMCPMC4955145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.