ArticleThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse2017
Mixture models of delay discounting and smoking behavior.
Article in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Latent Heterogeneity in the Impact of Financial Coaching on Delay Discounting among Low-Income Smokers: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Time preferences and COVID-19 vaccination uptake.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Quitting Shisha Smoking Among Young Adults in Germany: Insights From an Online Survey on Sociodemographic, Perceptual and Behavioural Economic Factors Associated With Quit Attempts.Tobacco use insights · 2026Article
- Narrative episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and enhances goal salience in the general population: an online feasibility study.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Behavioral construction of the future.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023Review
- Chronic tobacco smoking, impaired reward-based decision-making, and role of insular cortex: A comparison between early-onset smokers and late-onset smokers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Willpower with and without effort.The Behavioral and brain sciences · 2020Article
- A brief review of choice bundling: A strategy to reduce delay discounting and bolster self-control.Addictive behaviors reports · 2020Review
- Amygdala Structural Connectivity Is Associated With Impulsive Choice and Difficulty Quitting Smoking.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- Addiction and Dopamine: Sex Differences and Insights from Studies of Smoking.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmokers exhibit an unusually high willingness to forgo a delayed reward of greater magnitude to receive a smaller, more immediate reward. The functional form of such "delay discounting" behavior is central to the discounting-based operationalization of impulsivity, and has implications for theories regarding the basis of steep discounting among smokers and treatment approaches to addiction.
objectivesWe examined the discounting behavior of current smokers, ex-smokers, and never-smokers to determine whether the functional form of discounting differs between these groups.
methodsParticipants completed a 27-item delay discounting questionnaire (25). We used finite mixture modeling in analyzing data as the product of two simultaneous data-generating processes (DGPs), a hyperbolic function and an exponential function, and compared results to a quasi-hyperbolic (QH) approximation, in a relatively large sample (n = 1205).
resultsConsistent with prior reports, current smokers exhibited steeper discounting relative to never-smokers across exponential, hyperbolic, and QH models. A mixture model provided significant support for exponential and hyperbolic discounting in the data, and both accounted for roughly 50% of the participants' choices. This mixture model showed a statistically significantly better fit to the data than the exponential, hyperbolic, or QH functions alone. Contrary to the prevailing view, current smokers were not more likely to discount hyperbolically than nonsmokers, and, thus, were not more prone to time-inconsistent discounting.
conclusionsThe results inform the interpretation of steep discounting among smokers and suggest that treatment approaches could be tailored to the type of discounting behavior that smokers exhibit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27439543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.