Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439524›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2016

Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre.

Olusegun O Soge, David No, Karen E Michael, Jennifer Dankoff, Jennifer Lane, Keith Vogel, Jeremy Smedley, Marilyn C Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evidence of potentialMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  7. Pet animals as reservoirs for spreading methicillin-resistantJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sequence Analysis of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Performance Evaluation of the IR BiotyperAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Description of Staphylococcal Strains from Straw-Coloured Fruit Bat (Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Association of Primate Veterinarians' Guidelines for the Judicious Use of Antimicrobials.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  15. Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-SusceptibleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. The Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olusegun O SogeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
David NoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Karen E MichaelDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer DankoffDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer LaneWashington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Keith VogelWashington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeremy SmedleyWashington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marilyn C RobertsDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA marilynr@u.washington.edu.

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMDR MRSA isolates cultured from primates, their facility and primate personnel from the Washington National Primate Research Center were characterized to determine whether they were epidemiologically related to each other and if they represented common local human-associated MRSA strains.

methodsHuman and primate nasal and composite environmental samples were collected, enriched and selected on medium supplemented with oxacillin and polymyxin B. Isolates were biochemically verified as Staphylococcus aureus and screened for the mecA gene. Selected isolates were characterized using SCCmec typing, MLST and WGS.

resultsNasal cultures were performed on 596 primates and 105 (17.6%) were MRSA positive. Two of 79 (2.5%) personnel and two of 56 (3.6%) composite primate environmental facility samples were MRSA positive. Three MRSA isolates from primates, one MRSA from personnel, two environmental MRSA and one primate MSSA were ST188 and were the same strain type by conventional typing methods. ST188 isolates were related to a 2007 ST188 human isolate from Hong Kong. Both MRSA isolates from out-of-state primates had a novel MLST type, ST3268, and an unrelated group. All isolates carried ≥1 other antibiotic resistance gene(s), including tet(38), the only tet gene identified.

conclusionsST188 is very rare in North America and has almost exclusively been identified in people from Pan-Asia, while ST3268 is a newly reported MRSA type. The data suggest that the primate MDR MRSA was unlikely to come from primate centre employees. Captive primates are likely to be an unappreciated source of MRSA.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsCarrier StateDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnvironmental MicrobiologyGenotypeHumansLaboratory PersonnelMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingNosePenicillin-Binding ProteinsPrimate DiseasesPrimatesStaphylococcal InfectionsBacterial ProteinsmecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusPenicillin-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27439524
PMCPMC5031921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.