Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439499›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Improved drug-use patterns at 6 months post-discharge from inpatient substance use disorder treatment: results from compulsorily and voluntarily admitted patients.

Adrian R Pasareanu, John-Kåre Vederhus, Anne Opsal, Øistein Kristensen, Thomas Clausen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Secure care: a question of capacity, autonomy and the best interests of the child.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The authors respond to comments on the use of secure care in youth.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  11. Secure care: more harm than good.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian R PasareanuAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, Po. box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway. adrian.razvan.pasareanu@sshf.no.
John-Kåre VederhusAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, Po. box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Anne OpsalAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, Po. box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Øistein KristensenAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, Po. box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Thomas ClausenAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, Po. box 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Sørlandet Sykehus · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment services to patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), including those mandated to treatment, needs to be evaluated and evidence based. The Norwegian Municipal Health Care Act calls for mandated treatment for persons with "severe and life-threatening substance use disorder" if these individuals are not otherwise willing to be voluntarily treated and consequently risk their lives over drug use. This study aims to examine substance use-related outcomes at 6 months following inpatient treatment and to analyse factors associated with improved outcomes and abstinence.

methodThis prospective study followed 202 hospitalized patients with SUD who were admitted voluntarily (VA; n = 137) or compulsorily (CA; n = 65). The European Addiction Severity Index was used at baseline and at follow-up to assess socio-demographic and substance use variables. Regression analysis was conducted to investigate factors associated with abstinence at 6 months of follow-up.

resultsThe frequency of use of a preferred substance showed marked improvement for both VA and CA patients (61 and 37 %, respectively) at follow-up. Seventy-five percent of VA patients using amphetamine reported improvement compared to 53 % of CA patients. At follow-up, the CA group continued to have a higher rate of injection use. The CA group had experienced higher rates of overdose in the past 6 months and lower abstinence rates (24 % versus 50 %) at follow-up. A lower severity of drug use at intake (non-injection drug use), voluntary treatment modality, and higher treatment involvement during follow-up all were significant factors associated with abstinence at 6 months after treatment.

conclusionVoluntary treatment for SUD generally yielded better outcomes; nevertheless, we also found improved outcomes for CA patients. It is important to keep in mind that in reality, the alternative to CA treatment is no treatment at all and instead a continuation of life-threatening drug use behaviours. Our observed outcomes for CA patients support the continuation of CA treatment.

Indexed as

HospitalizationMedication AdherencePatient DischargeAdultFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMandatory ProgramsNorwayProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeCompulsory treatmentSubstance use disorderTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID27439499
PMCPMC4955204
OpenAlexW2482679208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.