Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439472›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

"I didn't really understand it, I just thought it'd help": exploring the motivations, understandings and experiences of patients with advanced lung cancer participating in a non-placebo clinical IMP trial.

Emily Harrop, Simon Noble, Michelle Edwards, Stephanie Sivell, Barbara Moore, Annmarie Nelson, FRAGMATIC Trial Management Group (TMG)

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review in Palliative and End-of-Life Care.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily HarropMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, 1st Floor Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK. harrope@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-0023
Simon NobleMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, 1st Floor Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Michelle EdwardsSchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, UK.
Stephanie SivellMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, 1st Floor Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Barbara MooreHealth and Care Research Wales Support Centre, Castelbridge 4, 15-19 Cowbridge Road East, Cardiff, CF11 9AB, UK.
Annmarie NelsonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, 1st Floor Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
FRAGMATIC Trial Management Group (TMG)
Marie Curie · GBHealth and Care Research Wales · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have explored in depth the experiences of patients with advanced cancer who are participating in clinical investigational medicinal product trials. However, integrated qualitative studies in such trials are needed to enable a broader evaluation of patient experiences in the trial, with important ethical and practical implications for the design and conduct of similar trials and treatment regimes in the future.

methodsTen participants were recruited from the control and intervention arms of FRAGMATIC: a non-placebo trial for patients with advanced lung cancer. Participants were interviewed at up to three time points during their time in the trial. Interviews were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis.

resultsPatients were motivated to join the trial out of hope of medical benefit and altruism. Understanding of randomisation was mixed and in some cases poor, as was appreciation of trial purpose and equipoise. The trial was acceptable to and evaluated positively by most participants; participants receiving the intervention focused on the potential treatment benefits they hoped they would receive, whilst participants in the control arm found alternative reasons, such as altruism, personal fulfilment and positive attention, to commit to and perceive benefits from the trial. However, whilst experiences were generally very positive, poor understanding, limited engagement with trial information and focus on treatment benefits amongst some participants give cause for concern.

conclusionsBy exploring longitudinally the psychological, emotional and cognitive domains of trial participation, we consider potential harms and benefits of participation in non-placebo trials amongst patients with advanced lung cancer and identify several implications for future research with and care for patients with advanced cancer.

trial registrationISRCTN80812769 . Registered on 8 July 2005.

Indexed as

MotivationPatient SelectionFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleConsentLung cancerQualitativeRandomisationRCT

Identifiers

PMID27439472
PMCPMC4955155
OpenAlexW2505811728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.