Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439430›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Prognostic value of quality of life score in disease-free survivors of surgically-treated lung cancer.

Young Ho Yun, Young Ae Kim, Jin Ah Sim, Ae Sun Shin, Yoon Jung Chang, Jongmog Lee, Moon Soo Kim, Young Mog Shim, Jae Lll Zo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Baseline functioning scales of quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) as a predictor of overall survival in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Global quality of life and mortality risk in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Young Ho YunDepartment of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-799, Korea. lawyun08@gmail.com.
Young Ae KimNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jin Ah SimDepartment of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-799, Korea.
Ae Sun ShinDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon Jung ChangNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jongmog LeeCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Moon Soo KimCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Young Mog ShimLung and Esophageal Cancer Center, Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Lll ZoLung and Esophageal Cancer Center, Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of quality of life (QOL) for predicting survival among disease-free survivors of surgically-treated lung cancer after the completion of cancer treatment.

methodsWe administered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) to 809 survivors who were surgically-treated for lung cancer at two hospitals from 2001 through 2006. We gathered mortality data by linkage to the National Statistical Office through December 2011. We used Cox proportional hazard models to compute adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate the relationship between QOL and survival.

resultsAnalyses of QOL items adjusted for age, sex, stage, body mass index, and physical activity showed that scores for poor physical functioning, dyspnea, anorexia, diarrhea, cough, personal strength, anxiety, and depression were associated with poor survival. With adjustment for the independent indicators of survival, final multiple proportional hazard regression analyses of QOL show that physical functioning (aHR, 2.39; 95 % CI, 1.13-5.07), dyspnea (aHR, 1.56; 95 % CI, 1.01-2.40), personal strength (aHR, 2.36; 95 % CI, 1.31-4.27), and anxiety (aHR, 2.13; 95 % CI, 1.38-3.30) retained their independent prognostic power of survival.

conclusionThis study suggests that patient-reported QOL outcomes in disease-free survivors of surgically-treated lung cancer after the completion of active treatment has independent prognostic value for long-term survival.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAnalysis of VarianceDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRegression AnalysisSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID27439430
PMCPMC4952058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.