Trial reportTrials2016
Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for small fiber neuropathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02637700 (Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy for Small Fiber Neuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy for Small Fiber Neuropathy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study on Efficacy and Safety.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Patients With Painful Idiopathic Small Fiber Neuropathy.Neurology · 2021Trial
- Small Fiber Neuropathy Associated with Post-COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Arthritis: A Rare Post-Infective Syndrome or a New-Onset Disease?Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Novel Autoantibodies in Idiopathic Small Fiber Neuropathy.Annals of neurology · 2022Article
- Maintenance therapy with subcutaneous immunoglobulin in a patient with immune-mediated neuropathic postural tachycardia syndrome.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2021Article
- Long-term efficacy of immunoglobulins in small fiber neuropathy related to Sjögren's syndrome.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- A Systematic Review of Pharmacologic and Rehabilitative Treatment of Small Fiber Neuropathies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Acute monophasic erythromelalgia pain in five children diagnosed as small-fiber neuropathy.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2020Article
- A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Methods of Small Fiber Neuropathies in Rehabilitation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Scientific Advances in and Clinical Approaches to Small-Fiber Polyneuropathy: A Review.JAMA neurology · 2019Article
- IVIg for apparently autoimmune small-fiber polyneuropathy: first analysis of efficacy and safety.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall fiber neuropathy is the most common cause of neuropathic pain in peripheral neuropathies, with a minimum prevalence of 53/100,000. Patients experience excruciating pain, and currently available anti-neuropathic and other pain drugs do not relieve the pain substantially. Several open-label studies have suggested an immunological basis in small fiber neuropathy and have reported efficacy of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin. Therefore, immunological mechanisms conceivably may play a role in small fiber neuropathy. To date, no randomized controlled study with intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with small fiber neuropathy has been performed. METHODS/
designThis study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial in patients with idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. The primary objective is to investigate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo on pain alleviation. A 1-point change in the PI-NRS compared to baseline is considered the minimum clinically important difference. In the IVIg-treated group, we assume a response rate of approximately 60 % based on the criteria composed by the IMMPACT group for measurement of pain. Based on this, a sample size of 60 patients is needed. Eligible patients fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive either intravenous immunoglobulin or placebo (0.9 % saline). The treatment regimen will start with a loading dose of 2 g/kg body weight over 2-4 consecutive days, followed by a maintenance dose of 1 g/kg body weight over 1-2 consecutive days given three times at a 3-week interval. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the percentage of responder subjects between the two treatment groups from the first randomization during the 12 weeks of treatment. A responder is defined as ≥ 1-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale improvement on the mean weekly peak pain relative to baseline. The secondary outcomes are pain intensity, pain qualities, other small fiber neuropathy-related complaints, daily and social functioning, as well as quality of life. In addition, safety assessments will be performed for adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory values outside the normal range. Responders during the 12-week treatment period will be followed during a 3-month extension phase. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with idiopathic small fiber neuropathy. Positive findings will result in a new treatment option for small fiber neuropathy and support an immunological role in this condition.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02637700 . Registered on 16 December 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.