Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27439370›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2016

Abediterol, a novel long-acting β2-agonist: bronchodilation, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic results from a single-dose, dose-ranging, active-comparator study in patients with COPD.

Jutta Beier, Helena Pujol, Beatriz Seoane, Eulalia Jimenez, Carol Astbury, Eric Massana, Sandrine Ruiz, Gonzalo de Miquel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01425814 (A Phase IIa, Randomised, Single Dose, Double-blind, Double-dummy, 6 Way Complete Cross-over, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 4 Strengths of LAS100977 QD Compared to Placebo and an Active Comparator in Patients With Stable Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01425814 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase IIa, Randomised, Single Dose, Double-blind, Double-dummy, 6 Way Complete Cross-over, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 4 Strengths of LAS100977 QD Compared to Placebo and an Active Comparator in Patients With Stable Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2011 to 2012Enrolled87ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)ArmsLAS100977, Reference, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Asthma and COPD: A Focus on β-Agonists - Past, Present and Future.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jutta Beierinsaf Respiratory Research Institute, Biebricher Allee 34, 65187, Wiesbaden, Germany. j.beier@insaf-wi.de.
Helena PujolAstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Beatriz SeoaneAstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Eulalia JimenezAstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Carol AstburyAstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Eric MassanaAlmirall R&D Centre, Barcelona, Spain.
Sandrine RuizAstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.
Gonzalo de MiquelAstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbediterol is a novel, once-daily long-acting β2-agonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma in combination with an anti-inflammatory agent. This Phase IIa, randomised, double-blind, crossover study investigated the bronchodilation, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of abediterol in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

methodsSeventy patients (aged ≥40 years, Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage II/III) were randomised (1:1:1:1:1:1) to single doses of abediterol 0.625, 2.5, 5 or 10 μg, indacaterol 150 μg or placebo. Spirometry was performed up to 36 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in a subset of patients (N = 20). Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout the study.

resultsAbediterol (all doses) significantly improved change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) compared with placebo (0.102, 0.203, 0.233 and 0.259 L for abediterol 0.625, 2.5, 5 and 10 μg, respectively; all p < 0.0001; primary endpoint). Abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 μg significantly improved trough FEV1 compared with indacaterol 150 μg (0.092, 0.122 and 0.148 L, respectively; all p < 0.0001). Improvements in bronchodilation were maintained at all time points post-dose versus placebo (all abediterol doses) and from 15 or 30 min post-dose versus indacaterol 150 μg with abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 μg (all p < 0.05). Abediterol had low systemic exposure; incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups.

conclusionsAll doses of abediterol (0.625-10 μg) provided clinically and statistically significant, dose-dependent improvements in bronchodilation versus placebo, and abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 μg gave significant improvements versus indacaterol. All doses of abediterol were safe and well tolerated in patients with COPD.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01425814 . Registered 29 August 2011.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAgedBronchodilator AgentsCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeGermanyHumansIndansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive5-(2-((6-(2,2-difluoro-2-phenylethoxy)hexyl)amino)-1-hydroxyethyl)-8-hydroxyquinolin-2(1H)-oneAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsindacaterolIndansQuinolonesBronchodilationChronic respiratory diseaseCOPDLABA

Identifiers

PMID27439370
PMCPMC4955259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.